Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798248›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2022

Evaluating environmental and inhibitory control strategies to improve outcomes in a widely available weight loss program.

Nenette A Cáceres, Qihan Yu, Jessica Capaldi, Márcio Augusto Diniz, Hollie Raynor, Gary D Foster, Aaron R Seitz, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nenette A CáceresCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Qihan YuCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Jessica CapaldiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Márcio Augusto DinizCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Hollie RaynorUniversity of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Gary D FosterWW International, New York, NY; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Aaron R SeitzUniversity of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
Sarah-Jeanne SalvyCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: sarah.salvy@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Evaluating environmental control (AVOID) and inhibitory control (RESIST) strategies to improve weight management outcomesR01DK130851 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sarah-Jeanne Salvy · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK130851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many people try to lose weight, a large proportion of individuals do not achieve clinically significant weight loss. Nonresponse and relapse rates in lifestyle interventions are largely explained by challenges in avoiding or resisting temptation in the context of omnipresent food access. Innovative enhancement strategies are needed to help individuals manage temptation in evidence-based lifestyle interventions.

methodsThis prospective, four-parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of two weight management enhancement strategies on weight and dietary outcomes among individuals with overweight or obesity: (1) an environmental control strategy combining modification of the home food environment and grocery delivery (AVOID) and (2) an impulse control strategy involving daily, gamified inhibitory control training (RESIST). Women and men (n = 500) with overweight or obesity (Body Mass Index between 25 and 40.0 kg/m DISCUSSION: This research addresses the pragmatic question of how to best optimize behavior change: Should we modify the choice environment, strengthen individuals' self-regulation, or both, to maximize behavior change? This work can inform the development of enhancement strategies to promote adherence to lifestyle recommendations and other impulse control challenges.

Indexed as

Weight Reduction ProgramsFemaleHumansMaleObesityOverweightProspective StudiesWeight LossHome food environmentInhibitory control trainingObesityWeight management

Identifiers

PMID35798248
PMCPMC9420799
OpenAlexW4283815883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.