Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798223›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2022

Different efficacies of neutralizing antibodies and antiviral drugs on SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2.

Hirofumi Ohashi, Takayuki Hishiki, Daisuke Akazawa, Kwang Su Kim, Joohyeon Woo, Kaho Shionoya, Kana Tsuchimoto, Shoya Iwanami, Saya Moriyama, Hitomi Kinoshita and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The Omicron variant of concern: Diversification and convergent evolution in spike protein, and escape from anti-Spike monoclonal antibodies.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hirofumi OhashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Takayuki HishikiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Daisuke AkazawaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Kwang Su KimInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory (iBLab), Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Science System Simulation, Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Joohyeon WooInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory (iBLab), Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Kaho ShionoyaDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan; Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, 278-8510, Japan.
Kana TsuchimotoResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Shoya IwanamiInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory (iBLab), Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Saya MoriyamaResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Hitomi KinoshitaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Souichi YamadaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Yudai KurodaDepartment of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Tsukasa YamamotoDepartment of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Noriko KishidaCenter for Influenza and Respiratory Virus Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 208-0011, Japan.
Shinji WatanabeCenter for Influenza and Respiratory Virus Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 208-0011, Japan.
Hideki HasegawaCenter for Influenza and Respiratory Virus Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 208-0011, Japan.
Hideki EbiharaDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Tadaki SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Ken MaedaDepartment of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Shuetsu FukushiDepartment of Virology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Yoshimasa TakahashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan.
Shingo IwamiInterdisciplinary Biology Laboratory (iBLab), Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan; Institute of Mathematics for Industry, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences Program (iTHEMS), RIKEN, Saitama, Japan; NEXT-Ganken Program, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), Tokyo, Japan; Science Groove Inc., Fukuoka, 8100041, Japan. Electronic address: iwami.iblab@bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Koichi WatashiResearch Center for Drug and Vaccine Development, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan; Department of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan; Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, 278-8510, Japan. Electronic address: kwatashi@niid.go.jp.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant BA.2 has spread in many countries, replacing the earlier Omicron subvariant BA.1 and other variants. Here, using a cell culture infection assay, we quantified the intrinsic sensitivity of BA.2 and BA.1 compared with other variants of concern, Alpha, Gamma, and Delta, to five approved-neutralizing antibodies and antiviral drugs. Our assay revealed the diverse sensitivities of these variants to antibodies, including the loss of response of both BA.1 and BA.2 to casirivimab and of BA.1 to imdevimab. In contrast, EIDD-1931 and nirmatrelvir showed a more conserved activities to these variants. The viral response profile combined with mathematical analysis estimated differences in antiviral effects among variants in the clinical concentrations. These analyses provide essential evidence that gives insight into variant emergence's impact on choosing optimal drug treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentsHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntiviral AgentscasirivimabimdevimabAntiviralBA.1BA.2CasirivimabImdevimabMolnupiravirNirmatrelvirOmicronSARS-CoV-2Sotrovimab

Identifiers

PMID35798223
PMCPMC9251960
OpenAlexW4283815734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.