Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35798181›Full record

ArticleHellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese

Changes to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) services during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A single centre experience from United Kingdom tertiary hospital.

Joon Heng Tan, Tsu Kuan Teoh, Julia Ivanova, Richard Varcoe, Sachin Jadhav, Kamran Baig, Ashan Gunarathne

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joon Heng TanTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: joon.tan@nhs.net.
Tsu Kuan TeohTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Julia IvanovaTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Richard VarcoeTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Sachin JadhavTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Kamran BaigTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Ashan GunarathneTrent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCOVID-19 had a devastating impact on patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Like many cardiac procedures, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) services were suspended during the first wave of COVID-19. We took the opportunity to evaluate the clinical outcomes and identify any delays at different stages of the TAVR pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsProspectively collected data on 210 consecutive TAVR patients between March 2019 and March 2021 were analysed. We compared the clinical outcomes and 30-day mortality rates of TAVR cases pre-pandemic and during the pandemic. We also looked to identify any time lags from the initial referral to respective stages of the TAVR workup.

resultsA total of 134 patients underwent TAVR prior to the national lockdown (March 2019-March 2020), compared to 76 patients during COVID-19 (April 2020-April 2021). Success rates of TAVR were similar (99% prior to the pandemic and 97.4% during COVID-19). The 30-day survival rates were 98.6% and 94.7%, respectively. Median length of stay post TAVR was 2 days during COVID-19 and 2.5 days prior to the pandemic (p = 0.064). Patients were seen quicker in clinic (median of 33 days) during COVID-19, compared to 51 days before COVID-19 (p = 0.044). No significant difference in times from referral to discussion at TAVR multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, CT Aortogram and TAVR implantation, in both groups.

conclusionsReconfiguring the patient pathway during COVID-19 allowed TAVR to be performed safely, with a similar success rate and no excess complications or increased 30-day mortality. There proved to be no delay in the respective stages of patient TAVR workup, during the pandemic.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisCOVID-19Heart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAortic stenosisCOVID-19TAVR

Identifiers

PMID35798181
PMCPMC9251899
OpenAlexW4283815783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.