Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35797721›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

The influence of parent-child gender on intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns/side effects, National Immunization Survey - Teen, 2010-2019.

Onyema Greg Chido-Amajuoyi, Rajesh Talluri, Inimfon Jackson, Sahil S Shete, Joel Fokom Domgue, Sanjay Shete

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Onyema Greg Chido-AmajuoyiDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rajesh TalluriDepartment of Data Science, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Inimfon JacksonDepartment of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sahil S SheteDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.
Joel Fokom DomgueDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-9262
Sanjay SheteDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7622-376X
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USEinstein Medical Center Philadelphia · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid subpar uptake of HPV vaccination in the United States, gender-generated disparities in HPV vaccination uptake have the potential to perpetuate existing disparities in HPV-associated cancers. Yet few studies have investigated the influence of parent-child gender on intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns/side effects. This study used nationally representative data, spanning 2010-2019, from the National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen). NIS-Teen respondents are parents/guardians or primary caregivers of adolescents 13-17 years old living in the United States. Over the study period, intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns rose among all parent-child gender pairings but were highest among respondent mothers regarding their unvaccinated daughters. The results revealed a statistically significant increased likelihood of having intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns among all parent-child combinations compared with father-son pairs. These odds were consistently highest among mother-daughter pairs. In 2019, compared with father-son pairs, fathers were 1.94 (95% CI: 1.21-3.12) times more likely to report the intention to not vaccinate against HPV for their daughters, while mothers were 2.23 (95% CI: 1.57-3.17) and 2.87 (95% CI: 2.02-4.09) times more likely to report intentions to refuse HPV vaccination for their sons and daughters, respectively. These findings were persistent and constantly increased over the 10-year study period. Interventions aimed at correcting gender-based misperceptions and countering misinformation about the safety of the HPV vaccine are warranted.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunizationIntentionParent-Child RelationsParentsUnited StatesVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesHPV vaccinationNational Immunization Survey-Teennational trendssafety concerns/side effectsvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35797721
PMCPMC9621054
OpenAlexW4284880106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.