Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35797554›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2023

Prospective Study of Perioperative Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Timothy E Newhook, Michael J Overman, Yun Shin Chun, Arvind Dasari, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Hop S Tran Cao, Victoria Raymond, Christine Parseghian, Benny Johnson, Yujiro Nishioka and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cancers · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy E NewhookDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Yun Shin ChunDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Arvind DasariDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Hop S Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Victoria RaymondGuardant Health, Inc, Redwood City, CA.
Christine ParseghianDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Benny JohnsonDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Yujiro NishiokaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Yoshikuni KawaguchiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abhineet UppalDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Timothy J VreelandDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.
Ariel JaimovichGuardant Health, Inc, Redwood City, CA.
Elsa M ArvideDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jenilette V CristoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Steven H WeiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Kanwal P RaghavDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Van K MorrisDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeffrey E LeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Scott KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jean-Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USGuardant (United States) · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 3: Inhibiting Oxidative Phosphorylation in Pancreatic CancerP50CA221707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2023
$11.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established.

methodsPatients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013-2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months.

resultsForty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/-) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA-/-) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/-, not reached; ctDNA-/-, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/- was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/- and ctDNA-/- were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53; ctDNA-/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.56).

conclusionsPerioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHepatectomyHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID35797554
OpenAlexW4283827272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.