ArticlePloS one2022
Quantitative CT lung densitometry as an obstructive marker for the diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans in children.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quantitative diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) densitometry in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). We measured the mean lung density (MLD) and represented the difference of MLD in inspiratory and expiratory phases (MLDD), the ratio of the MLD (E/I MLD), and the relative volume percentage of lung density at 50-Hounsfield unit (HU) interval threshold (E600 to E950). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the lung density indices for the diagnosis of BO. A total of 81 patients, including 51 patients with BO and 30 controls, were included in this study. In the BO patients, expiratory (EXP) MLD and MLDD were significantly lower, and E/I MLD and expiratory low attenuation areas below the threshold of -850 HU to -950 HU (E850, E900, and E950) were statistically significantly higher than controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that MLDD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98, p < .001), E/I MLD (OR = 1.39, p < .001), and E850 to E950 were significant densitometry parameters for BO diagnosis. In a receiver-operating characteristic analysis, E900 (cutoff, 1.4%; AUC = 0.920), E/I MLD (cutoff, 0.87; AUC = 0.887), and MLDD (cutoff, 109 HU; AUC = 0.867) showed high accuracy for the diagnosis of BO. In conclusion, the lung CT densitometry can serve as a quantitative marker providing additional indications of expiratory airflow limitation in pediatric patients with BO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.