Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35797372›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prevalence and determinants of obesity and abdominal obesity among rural workers in Southeastern Brazil.

Monica Cattafesta, Glenda Blaser Petarli, Eliana Zandonade, Olívia Maria de Paula Alves Bezerra, Sandra Marlene Ribeiro de Abreu, Luciane Bresciani Salaroli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic Syndrome and Associated Factors in Farmers in Southeastern Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica CattafestaGraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-622X
Glenda Blaser PetarliGraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Eliana ZandonadeGraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil.
Olívia Maria de Paula Alves BezerraDepartment of Family Medicine, Mental and Collective Health, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto/MG, Brazil.
Sandra Marlene Ribeiro de AbreuResearch Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL) of Faculty of Sports-University of Porto (FADEUP), Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), and Faculty of Sports, Research Center on Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luciane Bresciani SalaroliGraduate Program in Collective Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória/ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-0306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the nutritional status of rural workers from a municipality in Southeastern Brazil and estimate the association of sociodemographic, labor, lifestyle, and dietary pattern factors with obesity and abdominal obesity of men and women of this rural area. This is a cross-sectional, epidemiological study of 740 farmers (51.5%, n = 381 males; 48.5%, n = 359 females). The sociodemographic, labor, lifestyle and dietary patterns determinants were assessed. Food intake data were obtained by applying three 24-hour recalls and dietary patterns were determined by Principal Component Analysis with Varimax orthogonal rotation. Poisson regression with robust variance stratified by sex was applied. The general prevalence of overweight status was 31.5% (95% CI 28.2-34.8%), 19.7% of obesity (95% CI 16.8-22.6%) and 31.5% of abdominal obesity (95% CI 28.2-34.8%), with higher rates in women (P < 0.001). Men of higher socioeconomic class had a 2.3 times higher prevalence of obesity (95% CI 1.08-4.90). In addition, the shorter travel time to purchase food increased the prevalence of abdominal obesity in males. For women, the older the age group, the greater the general and central obesity. A lower adherence to traditional dietary patterns (approximately PR [prevalence ratio] 1.6 for general obesity and PR 1.3 for abdominal obesity) and a greater number of places to buy food were associated with higher rates of obesity in women. Finally, women farmers with a higher workload had a 20% lower prevalence of central obesity (PR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.97). Such findings demonstrate that obesity must be an issue in the health care of remote and rural populations. There is a need to promote healthier environments that respect traditional food culture through multiple approaches that consider the heterogeneity of rural areas and the differences between sexes.

Indexed as

Obesity, AbdominalRural PopulationBody Mass IndexBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObesityPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID35797372
PMCPMC9262245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.