ArticleThe ultrasound journal2022
Time course of lung ultrasound findings in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and cardiac dysfunction.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten Questions on Using Lung Ultrasonography to Diagnose and Manage Pneumonia in Hospital-at-Home Model: Part II-Confounders and Mimickers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- We Need to Talk About Lung Ultrasound Score: Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission with Machine Learning.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Impact of ultrasound settings on lung vertical artefacts: an observational study in mechanically ventilated patients.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Ten Questions on Using Lung Ultrasonography to Diagnose and Manage Pneumonia in the Hospital-at-Home Model: Part I-Techniques and Patterns.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- To B or not to B-lines.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Article
- Lung ultrasound and supine chest X-ray use in modern adult intensive care: mapping 30 years of advancement (1993-2023).The ultrasound journal · 2024Review
- Point-of-care ultrasound use in COVID-19: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Lung Ultrasound in Adults and Children with COVID-19: From First Discoveries to Recent Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung ultrasound (LUS) is a valuable tool to predict and monitor the COVID-19 pneumonia course. However, the influence of cardiac dysfunction (CD) on LUS findings remains to be studied. Our objective was to determine the effect of CD on LUS in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND
methodsFifty-one patients with COVID-19 pneumonia participated in the study. Focused echocardiography (FoCUS) was carried out on day 1 to separate patients into two groups depending on whether they had FoCUS signs of CD (CD+ vs CD-). LUS scores, based on the thickness of the pleural line, the B-line characteristics, and the presence or not of consolidations, were obtained three times along the patient's admission (D1, D5, D10) and compared between CD+ and CD- patients. A correlation analysis was carried out between LUS scores and the ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of the inspired oxygen (P/F ratio).
resultsTwenty-two patients were CD+ and 29 patients were CD-. Among the CD+ patients, 19 were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), seven received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and one did not survive. Among the CD- patients, 11 were admitted to the ICU, one received IMV and seven did not survive. CD+ patients showed a significantly lower P/F ratio than CD- patients. However, LUS scores showed no between-group differences, except for fewer subpleural consolidations in the upper quadrants of CD+ than on CD- patients.
conclusionIn patients with COVID-19, CD contributed to a worse clinical course, but it did not induce significant changes in LUS. Our findings suggest that pathophysiological factors other than those reflected by LUS may be responsible for the differences in clinical condition between CD+ and CD- patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.