Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35796766›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2022

Diabetes Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service Plans: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry.

Utibe R Essien, Yuanyuan Tang, Jose F Figueroa, Terrence Michael A Litam, Fengming Tang, Philip G Jones, Ravi Patel, Rishi K Wadhera, Nihar R Desai, Sanjeev N Mehta and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Causal Inference in Health Disparities Research.Annual review of public health · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Novel Cardiometabolic Medications in the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Era.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025 · on this map
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Utibe R EssienDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Yuanyuan TangSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Jose F FigueroaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Terrence Michael A LitamCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Fengming TangSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Philip G JonesSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Ravi PatelDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Rishi K WadheraRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Nihar R DesaiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Sanjeev N MehtaClinical, Behavioral, and Outcomes Research Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA.
Mikhail N KosiborodSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO.
Muthiah VaduganathanDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-1953
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USJoslin Diabetes Center · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)KL2TR001424 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2015 to 2023
$8.1M
Explaining Rising Heart Failure Mortality in MedicareK23HL148525 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WADHERA, RISHI KUMAR · 2019 to 2023
$863k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001424NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL148525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMedicare Advantage (MA), Medicare's managed care program, is quickly expanding, yet little is known about diabetes care quality delivered under MA compared with traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old enrolled in the Diabetes Collaborative Registry from 2014 to 2019 with type 2 diabetes treated with one or more antihyperglycemic therapies. Quality measures, cardiometabolic risk factor control, and antihyperglycemic prescription patterns were compared between Medicare plan groups, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

resultsAmong 345,911 Medicare beneficiaries, 229,598 (66%) were enrolled in FFS and 116,313 (34%) in MA plans (for ≥1 month). MA beneficiaries were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers for coronary artery disease, tobacco cessation counseling, and screening for retinopathy, foot care, and kidney disease (adjusted P ≤ 0.001 for all). MA beneficiaries had modestly but significantly higher systolic blood pressure (+0.2 mmHg), LDL cholesterol (+2.6 mg/dL), and HbA1c (+0.1%) (adjusted P < 0.01 for all). MA beneficiaries were independently less likely to receive glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (6.9% vs. 9.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.84) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (5.4% vs. 6.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95). When integrating Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked data from 2014 to 2017 and more recent unlinked data from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry through 2019 (total N = 411,465), these therapeutic differences persisted, including among subgroups with established cardiovascular and kidney disease.

conclusionsWhile MA plans enable greater access to preventive care, this may not translate to improved intermediate health outcomes. MA beneficiaries are also less likely to receive newer antihyperglycemic therapies with proven outcome benefits in high-risk individuals. Long-term health outcomes under various Medicare plans requires surveillance.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Medicare Part CAgedFee-for-Service PlansHumansHypoglycemic AgentsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID35796766
PMCPMC9577184
OpenAlexW4284700089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.