Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35796684›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cosmetic dermatology2023

Efficacy and safety of a new peeling formulated with a pool of PHAs for the treatment of all skin types, even sensitive.

Giulia Gentili, Paola Perugini, Stefano Bugliaro, Camilla D'Antonio

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07401342 (An Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Employing a Duosomal Chemical Peel for Aesthetic Enhancement in the Periocular and Facial Regions), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07401342 phase4completednot on this map

An Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Employing a Duosomal Chemical Peel for Aesthetic Enhancement in the Periocular and Facial Regions

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de ValencianaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsChemical PeelingArmsDuosomal chemical peel application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia GentiliScientific Department, Medspa, Milano, Italy.
Paola PeruginiDepartment of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-8534
Stefano BugliaroCoslab Tecnologia Cosmetica, Brescia, Italy.
Camilla D'AntonioScientific Department, Medspa, Milano, Italy.
Istituto Scientifico Italiano Colonna Vertebrale · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActually, the use of chemical peels in cosmetics and dermatology continues to grow due to their versatility, clinical endpoint-directed predictability, and favorable risk profile in comparison to lasers. The chemical peel is a generally safe method for treatment of some skin disorders and to refresh and rejuvenate the skin. The major challenge of chemical peels is the tolerability, that is because of sensitive skin which is one of the most common skin disorders.

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the new Miamo Renewal Peel Serum formulated with a pool of new generation acids (ELPA25™) on sensitive skin with respect to mandelic acid serum only and with respect to placebo comparison. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe "in vivo" study following the half-face experimental protocol active versus placebo involved 30 healthy Caucasian female volunteers between 25 and 64 years, with sensitive skin, who were divided into two different groups. ELPA25™ serum was applied in one group three times a week for 8 weeks. The other group, with the same protocol, applied an active serum containing mandelic acid, as control, versus placebo. In particular, skin moisturizing, skin viscoelastic properties, skin surface smoothness, wrinkle reduction, and stratum corneum renewal were evaluated.

resultsRenewal Peel Serum was very well tolerated from sensitive skin. A significant decrease in skin roughness and wrinkle breadth, and an improvement in firmness and in skin elasticity, was observed after 2 months of treatment with respect both to mandelic acid serum and to placebo comparison.

conclusionsScientific protocol using self-controlled study methodology and noninvasive skin bioengineering techniques with adequate statistical methods were able to evaluate both the safety and the efficacy of the new Miamo Renewal Peel Serum. This study highlighted that the Miamo Renewal Peel Serum formulated with a patent-pending mixture of new generation acids (ELPA25™) exerts many beneficial effects and it can be successfully employed for sensitive skin.

Indexed as

ChemexfoliationSkin AgingSkin DiseasesFemaleHumansMandelic AcidsSkinTreatment Outcomemandelic acidMandelic Acidschemical peelinglactobionic acidmandelic acidsensitive skin

Identifiers

PMID35796684
PMCPMC10087944
OpenAlexW4284703714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.