Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35796389›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Generalized additive models to analyze nonlinear trends in biomedical longitudinal data using R: Beyond repeated measures ANOVA and linear mixed models.

Ariel I Mundo, John R Tipton, Timothy J Muldoon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ariel I MundoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-4538
John R TiptonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6135-8191
Timothy J MuldoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

Unraveling Gene-Environment Interactions Shaping Metabolism: A Multi-Omics Analysis in DrosophilaP20GM139768 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI Joanna Fiddler · 2021 to 2026
$17.0M
The role of optical biomarkers in endoscopic detection and therapeutic monitoring of gastrointestinal cancerR15CA202662 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI MULDOON, TIMOTHY J · 2016 to 2016
$442k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA202662NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biomedical research, the outcome of longitudinal studies has been traditionally analyzed using the repeated measures analysis of variance (rm-ANOVA) or more recently, linear mixed models (LMEMs). Although LMEMs are less restrictive than rm-ANOVA as they can work with unbalanced data and non-constant correlation between observations, both methodologies assume a linear trend in the measured response. It is common in biomedical research that the true trend response is nonlinear and in these cases the linearity assumption of rm-ANOVA and LMEMs can lead to biased estimates and unreliable inference. In contrast, GAMs relax the linearity assumption of rm-ANOVA and LMEMs and allow the data to determine the fit of the model while also permitting incomplete observations and different correlation structures. Therefore, GAMs present an excellent choice to analyze longitudinal data with non-linear trends in the context of biomedical research. This paper summarizes the limitations of rm-ANOVA and LMEMs and uses simulated data to visually show how both methods produce biased estimates when used on data with non-linear trends. We present the basic theory of GAMs and using reported trends of oxygen saturation in tumors, we simulate example longitudinal data (2 treatment groups, 10 subjects per group, 5 repeated measures for each group) to demonstrate their implementation in R. We also show that GAMs are able to produce estimates with non-linear trends even when incomplete observations exist (with 40% of the simulated observations missing). To make this work reproducible, the code and data used in this paper are available at: https://github.com/aimundo/GAMs-biomedical-research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchResearch DesignAnalysis of VarianceHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal Studiesbiomedical datageneralized additive modelslongitudinal dataRsimulation

Identifiers

PMID35796389
PMCPMC9844249
OpenAlexW4284673431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.