ArticleJAMA network open2022
Development and Validation of a Personalized Model With Transfer Learning for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Estimation Using Electronic Health Records.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Machine learning prediction of moderate-to-severe acute kidney injury after ICU admission and cardiac surgery with urine trace elements.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Current and Future Applications of AI-Driven Predictive Modeling and a Proposed Framework for AI-Bioprognostics in Kidney Care.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- SMART: a new patient similarity estimation framework for enhanced predictive modeling in acute kidney injury.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- A personalized prediction of longitudinal growth using People-Like-Me methods.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Prediction of the acupuncture effects on pregnancy outcomes with personalized, embryonic, endometrial characteristics in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Digital Cardiovascular Twins, AI Agents, and Sensor Data: A Narrative Review from System Architecture to Proactive Heart Health.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Autoencoder-Based Representation Learning for Similar Patients Retrieval From Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- A framework for integrating artificial intelligence for clinical care with continuous therapeutic monitoring.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Bridging Data Gaps in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of Transfer Learning in Structured Data Analysis.Health data science · 2025Review
- From bytes to nephrons: AI's journey in diabetic kidney disease.Journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- A machine learning approach to leveraging electronic health records for enhanced omics analysis.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Patient Similarity Measures for Outcome Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Article
- Using Domain Adaptation and Inductive Transfer Learning to Improve Patient Outcome Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Observational
- A two-tier feature selection method for predicting mortality risk in ICU patients with acute kidney injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- 2023 Beijing Health Data Science Summit.Health data science · 2024Article
- DeepJ: Graph Convolutional Transformers with Differentiable Pooling for Patient Trajectory Modeling.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the clinical value of 10 estimating glomerular filtration rate equations and construction of a prediction model for kidney damage in adults from central China.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a heterogeneous syndrome prevalent among hospitalized patients. Personalized risk estimation and risk factor identification may allow effective intervention and improved outcomes. Objective: To develop and validate personalized AKI risk estimation models using electronic health records (EHRs), examine whether personalized models were beneficial in comparison with global and subgroup models, and assess the heterogeneity of risk factors and their outcomes in different subpopulations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study analyzed EHR data from 1 tertiary care hospital and used machine learning and logistic regression to develop and validate global, subgroup, and personalized risk estimation models. Transfer learning was implemented to enhance the personalized model. Predictor outcomes across subpopulations were analyzed, and metaregression was used to explore predictor interactions. Adults who were hospitalized for 2 or more days from November 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, were included in the analysis. Patients with moderate or severe kidney dysfunction at admission were excluded. Data were analyzed between August 28, 2019, and May 8, 2022. Exposures: Clinical and laboratory variables in the EHR. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was AKI of any severity, and AKI was defined using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria. Performance of the models was measured with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve, and calibration. Results: The study cohort comprised 76 957 inpatient encounters. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 55.5 (17.4) years and included 42 159 men (54.8%). The personalized model with transfer learning outperformed the global model for AKI estimation in terms of AUROC among general inpatients (0.78 [95% CI, 0.77-0.79] vs 0.76 [95% CI, 0.75-0.76]; P < .001) and across the high-risk subgroups (0.79 [95% CI, 0.78-0.80] vs 0.75 [95% CI, 0.74-0.77]; P < .001) and low-risk subgroups (0.74 [95% CI, 0.73-0.75] vs 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.72]; P < .001). The AUROC improvement reached 0.13 for the high-risk subgroups, such as those undergoing liver transplant and cardiac surgery. Moreover, the personalized model with transfer learning performed better than or comparably with the best published models in well-studied AKI subgroups. Predictor outcomes varied significantly between patients, and interaction analysis uncovered modifiers of the predictor outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study demonstrated that a personalized modeling with transfer learning is an improved AKI risk estimation approach that can be used across diverse patient subgroups. Risk factor heterogeneity and interactions at the individual level highlighted the need for agile, personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.