Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35796209›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2022

Biomarker-driven prognostic models in chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.

Stuart J Pocock, João Pedro Ferreira, Milton Packer, Faiez Zannad, Gerasimos Filippatos, Toru Kondo, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon, James L Januzzi, Tomoko Iwata and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Stuart J PocockDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
João Pedro FerreiraUnIC@Rise, Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research and Development Center, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2304-6138
Milton PackerBaylor Heart and Vascular Hospital, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Faiez ZannadInserm, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, and Inserm U1116, CHRU, F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Gerasimos FilippatosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Toru KondoDepartment of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
James L JanuzziMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomoko IwataBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Afshin SalsaliBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Javed ButlerBaylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology, and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBritish Heart Foundation · GBInserm · FRBaylor University Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHarvard University · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBiomarker-driven prognostic models incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are lacking. We aimed to generate a biomarker-driven prognostic tool for patients with chronic HFpEF enrolled in EMPEROR-Preserved. METHODS AND

resultsMultivariable Cox regression models were created for (i) the primary composite outcome of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, (ii) all-cause death, (iii) cardiovascular death, and (iv) HF hospitalization. PARAGON-HF was used as a validation cohort. NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were the dominant predictors of the primary outcome, and in addition, a shorter time since last hospitalization, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), insulin-treated diabetes, low haemoglobin, and a longer time since HF diagnosis were key predictors (eight variables, all p < 0.001). The consequent primary outcome risk score discriminated well (c-statistic = 0.75) with patients in the top 10th of risk having an event rate >22× higher than those in the bottom 10th. A model for HF hospitalization alone had even better discrimination (c = 0.79). Empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF in patients across all risk levels. NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT were also the dominant predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality followed by history of COPD, low albumin, older age, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, NYHA class III or IV and insulin-treated diabetes (eight variables, all p < 0.001). The mortality risk model had similar discrimination for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (c-statistic = 0.72 for both). External validation provided c-statistics of 0.71, 0.71, 0.72, and 0.72 for the primary outcome, HF hospitalization alone, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death, respectively.

conclusionsThe combination of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT along with a few readily available clinical variables provides effective risk discrimination both for morbidity and mortality in patients with HFpEF. A predictive tool-kit facilitates the ready implementation of these risk models in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Heart FailureInsulinsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBiomarkersChronic DiseaseHumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftBiomarkersInsulinsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsBiomarkersHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionRisk model

Identifiers

PMID35796209
PMCPMC9796853
OpenAlexW4284670427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.