Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35796041›Full record

ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2023

Catalyzing success in community-based conservation.

Brandie Fariss, Nicole DeMello, Kathryn A Powlen, Christopher E Latimer, Yuta Masuda, Christina M Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Diagnosing scaling bottlenecks in 10 community conservation initiatives in southern and eastern Africa.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Enabling conditions for conservation on Indigenous and community lands.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Challenges in assessing the effects of environmental governance systems on conservation outcomes.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Catalyzing success in community-based conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brandie FarissGlobal Protect Oceans, Lands, and Waters Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9507-8999
Nicole DeMelloGlobal Conservation in Partnership with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Program, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7373-0325
Kathryn A PowlenDepartment of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9685-0063
Christopher E LatimerGlobal Protect Oceans, Lands, and Waters Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-7506
Yuta MasudaGlobal Science, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-4855
Christina M KennedyGlobal Protect Oceans, Lands, and Waters Program, The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-8728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to devolve rights and engage Indigenous Peoples and local communities in conservation have increased the demand for evidence of the efficacy of community-based conservation (CBC) and insights into what enables its success. We examined the human well-being and environmental outcomes of a diverse set of 128 CBC projects. Over 80% of CBC projects had some positive human well-being or environmental outcomes, although just 32% achieved positive outcomes for both (i.e., combined success). We coded 57 total national-, community-, and project-level variables and controls from this set, performed random forest classification to identify the variables most important to combined success, and calculated accumulated local effects to describe their individual influence on the probability of achieving it. The best predictors of combined success were 17 variables suggestive of various recommendations and opportunities for conservation practitioners related to national contexts, community characteristics, and the implementation of various strategies and interventions informed by existing CBC frameworks. Specifically, CBC projects had higher probabilities of combined success when they occurred in national contexts supportive of local governance, confronted challenges to collective action, promoted economic diversification, and invested in various capacity-building efforts. Our results provide important insights into how to encourage greater success in CBC.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansIndigenous Peoplesaccumulated local effectsaprendizaje automáticoclasificación aleatoria de bosquecommunity-based conservationconservación basada en evidenciasconservación basada en la comunidadconservation evaluationconservation outcomesefectos locales acumuladosevaluación de la conservaciónevidence-based conservationmachine learningrandom forest classificationresultados de la conservación保护结果保护评估基于社区的保护基于证据的保护机器学习累积局部效应随机森林分类

Identifiers

PMID35796041
PMCPMC10087706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.