ArticleHuman reproduction open2022
Preliminary report of intraovarian injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in extremely poor prognosis patients with only oocyte donation as alternative: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04275700 (Study of Ovarian Function Following Intraovarian Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Ovarian Function Following Intraovarian Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) In Women With Evidence of Diminished Ovarian Function
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking ovarian rejuvenation with platelet-rich plasma: systematic review and proposed clinical framework for Controlled use in poor prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma for enhanced ovarian function and reproductive success in women with POI and POR: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment of the ovaries significantly improves fertility parameters and reproductive outcomes in diminished ovarian reserve patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Pooled it
- The value of intraovarian autologous platelet rich plasma in women with poor ovarian reserve or ovarian insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of ovarian injection of autologous platelet rich plasma in patients with poor ovarian responder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Intraovarian Platelet-Rich Plasma for Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma combined with peripheral blood mononuclear cells improves ovarian function in advanced-age women with diminished ovarian reserve: a clinical retrospective cohort and single-cell transcriptomic analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Autologous platelet-rich plasma ovarian injection was associated with increased oocyte acquisition in patients with poor ovarian response: a retrospective propensity-matched study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of platelet-rich plasma at different concentrations on genes of apoptotic pathway and differentiation of stem cells in cyclophosphamide-induced ovarian failure in a mouse model: An experimental study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Article
- Premature ovarian insufficiency restoration after chemotherapy: current achievements and future prospects on its treatment or management.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Efficacy of intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma on outcome of in vitro fertilization in women with poor ovarian response: A systematic review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Review
- Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection significantly improves blastocyst yield and quality in IVF patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection in poor responders.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2024Article
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Does the Combination of Platelet-rich Plasma and Supervised Exercise Yield Better Pain Relief and Enhanced Function in Knee Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Optimization of Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation for Regenerative Medicine: Comparison of Different Anticoagulants and Resuspension Media.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Thrombocytes and Platelet-Rich Plasma as Modulators of Reproduction and Fertility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Beneficial effects of intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma in women with poor ovarian response.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023Article
- Biological therapies for premature ovarian insufficiency: what is the evidence?Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Review
- Epigenetics, ovarian cell plasticity, and platelet-rich plasma: Mechanistic theories.Reproduction & fertility · 2022Article
- Ovarian Function Restoration Using Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) change ovarian function in patients with extremely low functional ovarian reserve (LFOR) who, otherwise, would likely only have a chance of pregnancy through third-party oocyte donation? SUMMARY ANSWER: No clinically significant effects of PRP treatment on ovarian function were observed over 1 year of follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several investigators have reported improved responses to ovulation induction after treatment with PRP. However, previous published reports have involved, at most, only small case series. Whether PRP actually improves ovarian performance is, therefore, still unknown. PRP is nevertheless widely offered as an 'established' fertility treatment, often under the term 'ovarian rejuvenation'. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: We are reporting a prospective cohort study of 80 consecutive patients at ages 28-54 with LFOR, defined by anti-Müllerian hormone <1.1 ng/ml, FSH >12 mIU/ml or at least one prior IVF cycle with ≤3 oocytes within 1 year. The women were followed for 1 year after an intraovarian PRP procedure. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsPRP (1.5 ml) was injected into the cortex of ovaries with an average of 12 injections per ovary. Study participants were followed every 3 days for 2 weeks after PRP treatment with estradiol and FSH measurements and vaginal ultrasound to observe follicle growth and thereafter followed weekly. Beginning 1 month after their PRP treatment, participants underwent one or more cycles of ovarian stimulation for IVF. Outcome measures were endocrine response, and numbers of oocytes and embryos produced in response to a maximal gonadotropin stimulation before and after PRP treatment. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In this study, women failed to demonstrate statistically significant outcome benefits from intraovarian PRP. However, two 40-year-old very poor-prognosis patients, with prior failed IVF cycles that never reached embryo transfer at other centers, achieved pregnancy, resulting in an ongoing pregnancy rate of 4.7% among patients who, following PRP, produced at least one oocyte (n = 42). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: As an observational study of patients who performed poorly in past ovarian stimulation cycles, the improvement may be accounted for by regression to the mean. Similar considerations may also explain the occurrence of the two pregnancies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis study demonstrates that, even in extremely poor prognosis patients due to LFOR, sporadic pregnancies are possible. The study, however, does not allow for the conclusion that those pregnancies were the consequence of PRP treatments. A case series, indeed, does not allow for such conclusions, even if results are more suggestive than here. This registered study, therefore, must be viewed as a preliminary report, with further data expected from this study but also from two other prospectively randomized ongoing registered studies with more controlled patient selection. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by intramural funds from The Center for Human Reproduction and the not-for-profit research Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, both in New York, NY, USA. N.G. and D.H.B. are listed as co-inventors on several US patents. Some of these patents relate to pre-supplementation of hypo-androgenic infertile women with androgens, such as dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone and, therefore, at least peripherally relate to the subject of this manuscript. They, as well as D.F.A., have also received research support, travel funds and speaker honoraria from several pharmaceutical and medical device companies, though none related to the here presented subject and manuscript. N.G. is a shareholder in Fertility Nutraceuticals and he and D.H.B. receive royalty payments from Fertility Nutraceuticals LLC. E.M. has no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04275700.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.