Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795729›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Biomedical Microscopic Imaging in Computational Intelligence Using Deep Learning Ensemble Convolution Learning-Based Feature Extraction and Classification.

Tammineedi Venkata Satya Vivek, Ayesha Naureen, Mohd Shaikhul Ashraf, Sanhita Manna, Ahmed Mateen Buttar, P Muneeshwari, Mohd Wazih Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tammineedi Venkata Satya VivekDepartment of CSE, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-4007
Ayesha NaureenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, B V Raju Institute of Technology, Narsapur, Medak Dist, Telangana 502313, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-6762
Mohd Shaikhul AshrafDepartment of Botany, HKM Govt. Degree College Bandipora, Jammu and Kashmir, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7285-1563
Sanhita MannaSchool of Technology, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-1107
Ahmed Mateen ButtarDepartment of Computer Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9578-3367
P MuneeshwariInstitute of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Saveetha school of Engineering(SIMATS), Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-6103
Mohd Wazih AhmadASTU, Adama, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-2591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopy image analysis gives quantitative support for enhancing the characterizations of various diseases, including breast cancer, lung cancer, and brain tumors. As a result, it is crucial in computer-assisted diagnosis and prognosis. Understanding the biological principles underlying these dynamic image sequences often necessitates precise analysis and statistical quantification, a major discipline issue. Deep learning methods are increasingly used in bioimage processing as they grow rapidly. This research proposes novel biomedical microscopic image analysis techniques using deep learning architectures based on feature extraction and classification. Here, the input image has been taken as microscopic image, and it has been processed and analyzed for noise removal, edge smoothening, and normalization. The processed image has been extracted based on their features in microscopic image analysis using ConVol_NN architecture with AlexNet model. Then, the features have been classified using ensemble of Inception-ResNet and VGG-16 (EN_InResNet_VGG-16) architectures. The experimental results show various dataset analyses in terms of accuracy of 98%, precision of 90%, computational time of 79%, SNR of 89%, and MSE of 62%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35795729
PMCPMC9252635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.