Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795711›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2022

Determining the sensitivity of emergency dispatcher and paramedic diagnosis of stroke: statewide registry linkage study.

Amminadab L Eliakundu, Dominique A Cadilhac, Joosup Kim, Monique F Kilkenny, Kathleen L Bagot, Emily Andrew, Shelley Cox, Christopher F Bladin, Michael Stephenson, Lauren Pesavento and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prehospital stroke management and mobile stroke units.Current opinion in neurology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Amminadab L EliakunduStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-9422
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8162-682X
Joosup KimStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4079-0428
Monique F KilkennyStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-287X
Kathleen L BagotStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-4327
Emily AndrewAmbulance Victoria Victoria Australia.
Shelley CoxAmbulance Victoria Victoria Australia.
Christopher F BladinStroke Division Florey Institute of Neurosciences & Mental Health University of Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-0855
Michael StephensonAmbulance Victoria Victoria Australia.
Lauren PesaventoThe Melbourne Brain Centre and Department of Neurology The Royal Melbourne Hospital Victoria Australia.
Lauren SandersDepartment of Neurology St Vincent's Hospital Fitzroy Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-0181
Ben ClissoldDepartment of Neurology Geelong Hospital Geelong Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-9817
Henry MaStroke and Ageing Research Department of Medicine School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health Monash University Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-8059
Karen SmithAmbulance Victoria Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-0685
The University of Melbourne · AUAmbulance Victoria · AUGeelong Hospital · AUMonash Health · AUMonash Medical Centre · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Correctly identifying people with suspected stroke is essential for ensuring rapid treatment. Our aims were to determine the sensitivity of emergency dispatcher and paramedic identification of patients with stroke, the factors associated with correct identification, and whether there were any implications for hospital arrival times. Methods: Observational study using patient-level data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (2015-2017) linked with ambulance and emergency department records for the state of Victoria. The registry diagnosis was the reference standard to compare with the provisional diagnoses made by emergency services personnel classified as "suspected" and "not suspected" stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Multivariable logistic and quintile regressions were used to determine factors associated with correct identification and timely arrival to hospital. Results: Overall, 4717 (64%) were matched to ambulance transport records (median age: 73 years, 43% female). Stroke/TIA was suspected in 56% of registrants by call-takers and 69% by paramedics. Older patients (75+ years) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.75), females (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75-0.99), those with severe stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were less often suspected as stroke. Cases identified as stroke had a shorter arrival time to hospital (unadjusted median minutes: stroke, 54 [43, 72] vs not stroke, 66 [51, 89]). Conclusions: Emergency dispatchers and paramedics identified over half of patients with stroke in the prehospital setting. Important patient characteristics, such as being female and those having a severe stroke, were found that may enable refinement of prehospital ambulance protocols and dispatcher/paramedic education. Those correctly identified as stroke, arrived earlier to hospital optimizing their chances of receiving time-critical treatments.

Indexed as

ambulancesbig dataemergency medical servicesparamedicsprehospitalregistriessensitivitystroke

Identifiers

PMID35795711
PMCPMC9249375
OpenAlexW4283742524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.