Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795689›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Role of Ca

Archana G Mohanan, Sowmya Gunasekaran, Reena Sarah Jacob, R V Omkumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Understanding the Molecular Basis of Miller-Dieker Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Archana G MohananNeurobiology Division, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Sowmya GunasekaranNeurobiology Division, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Reena Sarah JacobNeurobiology Division, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
R V OmkumarNeurobiology Division, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Thiruvananthapuram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamatergic synapses harbor abundant amounts of the multifunctional Ca

Indexed as

Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II (CaMKII)CaMKII genetic modelsCaMKII mutationsglutamatergic synapseLTDLTPsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID35795689
PMCPMC9252440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.