Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Treat-and-Extend vs. Pro Re Nata Regimen for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Huixun Jia, Bing Lu, Yuanzhi Yuan, Fei Yuan, Lei Li, Yanping Song, Ao Rong, Minwen Zhou, Fenghua Wang, Xiaodong Sun

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02802657 (A Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of " Treat-and-Extend" Regimen Versus "Pro Re Nata" Regimen of Conbercept in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02802657 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of " Treat-and-Extend" Regimen Versus "Pro Re Nata" Regimen of Conbercept in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

TypeinterventionalSponsorXiaodong SunRan2016 to 2020Enrolled141ConditionsAge-related Macular DegenerationArmsTreat-and-Extend regimen, Pro Re Nata, Conbercept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A real-world study of Faricimab: efficacy and biomarkers in treatment-experienced neovascular age-related macular degeneration(nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Huixun JiaNational Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Bing LuNational Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Yuanzhi YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanping SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Central Theater Command General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Ao RongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Minwen ZhouNational Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Fenghua WangNational Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong SunNational Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai First People's Hospital · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTongji Hospital · CNWuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of conbercept using a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen vs. a pro re nata (PRN) regimen in Chinese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority study. After an initial loading phase of three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Conbercept, the patients were treated to PRN or T&E regimen. The prespecified retreatment criteria was defined as a more than 5-letter decrease in BCVA from the previous visit or any evidence of new retinal hemorrhages, or the presence of any IRF and any SRF of more than 200 μm in height at the sub-foveal center. The primary outcome was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to 24 months, with a prespecified non-inferiority limit of -5 letters. Results: From July 2016 through August 2018, 141 participants were allocated and treated (T&E, Conclusion: These findings suggest that the T&E regimen was not non-inferior to the PRN regimen in patients with nAMD in terms of BCVA outcomes through 24 months. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02802657.

Indexed as

anti-VEGFneovascular age-related macular degenerationnon-inferiority studypro re natatreat-and-extend

Identifiers

PMID35795633
PMCPMC9251380
OpenAlexW4283156383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.