Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795615›Full record

ArticleScanning2022

Diagnostic Value of Spiral CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanning in Gastric Cancer and Precancerous Lesions.

Yaolan Zhen, Qing Xie, Lei Liu

Retracted Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. It is linked to trial NCT05508126 (Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-parametric MRI and Dual-energy CT in Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05508126 recruitingnot on this map

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multi-parametric MRI and Dual-energy CT in Gastric Cancer: a Paired Validating Confirmatory Study

TypeobservationalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled222ConditionsGastric Cancer StageArmsDECT examination, mpMRI examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaolan ZhenOncology Department, Xianning Center Hospital, Xianning, Hubei 437100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3980-8894
Qing XieOncology Department, Xianning Center Hospital, Xianning, Hubei 437100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4659-3705
Lei LiuOncology Department, Xianning Center Hospital, Xianning, Hubei 437100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-2376
Xianning Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to explore the diagnostic value of spiral CT and magnetic resonance imaging scanning in gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, the author selected 56 gastric cancer patients treated in a medical center (group) as the experimental subjects, and all patients underwent MRI, multislice spiral CT scan, and enhanced CT scan two weeks before surgery; at the same time, the gastric cancer staging results of patients were diagnosed according to surgical pathology. All patients were examined under the condition of knowledge and performed breath-holding exercise before examination. The status, location, and extent of tumor lesions were evaluated. In comparison of T staging of gastric cancer patients with magnetic resonance scanning imaging and postoperative pathological examination results, among them, T staging of 3 patients did not match the results of pathological examination, the accuracy rates of T staging on magnetic resonance scanning imaging were T1 = 94.7%, T2 = 87.6%, T3 = 91.2%, and T4 = 94.7%, and the total accuracy was 92.1%. Comparison of helical CT scan imaging and postoperative pathological examination results is as follows. Among them, T staging of 8 patients did not match the results of pathological examination, 3 patients were ulcerative, 5 were protuberance, the accuracy rates of T staging in spiral CT scan imaging were T1 = 90.8%, T2 = 82.2%, T3 = 76.9%, and T4 = 87.6%, and the total accuracy was 84.5%. The total accuracy rate of imaging N staging was 77.5%, and the total accuracy rate of spiral CT scanning imaging N staging was 80.8%. The accuracy rates of M0 and M1 staging in magnetic resonance imaging were 100.0% and 96.5%, respectively, and the accuracy rates of M0 and M1 staging in spiral CT scan imaging were 96.5% and 96.5%, respectively. The accuracy rate of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of gastric cancer N staging was 77.4%, and the reason for the low accuracy rate was mainly because the enhancement effect was not obvious due to insufficient enhancement. The accuracy rate of spiral CT in diagnosing N staging of gastric cancer was 80.9%, which was mainly due to the small diameter of the middle celiac artery lymph nodes. Magnetic resonance and spiral CT scans have high value in the early diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Precancerous ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, Spiral ComputedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35795615
PMCPMC9152347
OpenAlexW4281383319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.