Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795585›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Cognitive Disorders in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Yuhan Zhou, Jieyuan Wang, Limin Cao, Mengyuan Shi, Huiyuan Liu, Yuhong Zhao, Yang Xia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [Modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia: an overview of established and emerging evidence].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhan ZhouDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jieyuan WangTibet Military Region Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of PLA, Tibet, China.
Limin CaoThe Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.
Mengyuan ShiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Huiyuan LiuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yuhong ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yang XiaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
China Medical University · CNTianjin Medical University · CNTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the quantitative associations between fruit and vegetable intake and cognitive disorders in older adults. Design: A meta-analysis. Setting and Participants: We used the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases for a literature search to 12 April 2022. We preliminarily retrieved 11,759 studies, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria including six cross-sectional studies, nine cohort studies and one case-control study, incorporating 64,348 participants and 9,879 cases. Methods: Using the three databases, we identified observational studies exploring the association. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Results: Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the results showed that increased fruit and vegetable consumption in older adults was associated with a decline in the prevalence of cognitive disorders (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.76-0.83). Moreover, intake of fruits (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and vegetables (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70-0.80) alone were both associated with a lower prevalence of cognitive disorders. Subgroup analyses indicated that the intake of fruits and vegetables was associated with the prevalence of cognitive impairment (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.76-0.80) and dementia (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78-0.91) but not Alzheimer's disease (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76-1.01). Conclusion and Implications: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that the intake of fruits and vegetables is inversely proportional and linearly associated with the prevalence of cognitive disorders in older adults. Future research is required to further investigate the preventive effects of the frequency, quantity, and duration of eating vegetables and fruits on cognitive disorders in older adults.

Indexed as

cognitive disordersdose-responsefruitmeta-analysisvegetable

Identifiers

PMID35795585
PMCPMC9251442
OpenAlexW4283205878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.