Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795374›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Impact of Educational Interventions on Knowledge About Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.

Kosar Gholami, Narges Norouzkhani, Meraj Kargar, Hamidreza Ghasemirad, Atieh Jafarabadi Ashtiani, Shamim Kiani, Mahdi Sajedi Far, Maryam Dianati, Yasaman Salimi, Amirmohammad Khalaji and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Kosar GholamiStudent Research Committee, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Narges NorouzkhaniDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Meraj KargarStudent Research Committee, Afzalipour Faculty of Medicine Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Hamidreza GhasemiradStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Atieh Jafarabadi AshtianiFaculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Shamim KianiStudent Research Committee, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mahdi Sajedi FarFaculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam DianatiStudent Research Committee, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Yasaman SalimiStudent Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Amirmohammad KhalajiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara HonariFaculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Niloofar DeraviStudents Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRShahed University · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRKerman University of Medical Sciences · IRRafsanjan University of Medical Sciences · IRSemnan University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including chronic hypertension, preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, is the cause of about 50,000 deaths out of 400,000 perinatal deaths. HDP is an effective risk factor in stroke, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases like ischemic heart disease. There is a significant relation between HDP, lifestyle, and knowledge. Unfortunately, many studies showed that pregnant women have lack of knowledge about HDP. Therefore, the importance of educational interventions is, today, more acknowledged than before. Aim: The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of interventional educations on the knowledge of pregnant women about HDP. Methods: A systematic review of the related articles was conducted. We included English randomized controlled trials published up to December 2021, including pregnant women as population, HDP as the outcome, and educational interventions as the intervention. Results: After the process of study selection, six articles containing 819 pregnant women were included in this study. Educational pamphlets, mobile-based application, a mixture of pamphlets, pictographic magnet and videos, and a combination of PowerPoint and data show projectors and conversation were the educational interventions in these studies. Conclusions: The positive effects of educational interventions on the knowledge of women with HTP were observed in all studies. The higher knowledge leads to HDP-related complications. Systematic Review Registration: https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-gcs5r-v1, identifier: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GCS5R.

Indexed as

educationhypertensionhypertensive disorders of pregnancypreeclampsiapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35795374
PMCPMC9252511
OpenAlexW4283157987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.