ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Comparison Between Treadmill and Bicycle Ergometer Exercises in Terms of Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07484776 (Metabolic Flexibility in Patients With Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer and the Possible Effect of a Physical Exercise Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Metabolic Flexibility in Patients With Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer and the Possible Effect of a Physical Exercise Intervention
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of the novel cardiometabolic index for reduced aerobic capacity in patients with coronary heart disease: a clinical comparative study of 378 cases.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Utility of Recumbent Ergometer-Based Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Utility of Field Tests for Predicting Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Prescribing Exercise Intensity in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Shall we go for a walk? A cross-sectional study comparing the 6 min walk test and cardiopulmonary exercise test for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in de novo kidney transplant recipients.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Safety of an Outdoor-Simulated Interactive Indoor Cycling Device for Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Pilot Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiopulmonary Test in Fontan Patients: Is the Type of Ergometer Critical?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Impact of cycling cadence on physiological response during a cardiopulmonary exercise test.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- The relationship between age related changes in strength and fitness with body size, shape and composition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Plantar Biomechanic Characteristics After High-Intensity Exercise in Young Runners With High-Arched Feet.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2025Article
- Heart Rate Recovery: Up to Date in Heart Failure-A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Effect of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Ability to Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Cardiovascular Response to Lower Body and Whole Body Exercise Among Sedentary Young Adults.Cureus · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of peak work rate indexed by left ventricular diameter.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Complications of exercise and pharmacologic stress echocardiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used widely in the diagnosis, exercise therapy, and prognosis evaluation of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The current guideline for CPET does not provide any specific recommendations for cardiovascular (CV) safety on exercise stimulation mode, including bicycle ergometer, treadmill, and total body workout equipment. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different exercise stimulation modes on the occurrence of safety events during CPET in patients with CHD. Methods: A total of 10,538 CPETs, including 5,674 performed using treadmill exercise and 4,864 performed using bicycle ergometer exercise at Peking University Third Hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. The incidences of CV events and serious adverse events during CPET were compared between the two exercise groups. Results: Cardiovascular events in enrolled patients occurred during 355 CPETs (3.4%), including 2 cases of adverse events (0.019%), both in the treadmill group. The incidences of overall events [235 (4.1%) vs. 120 (2.5%), Conclusion: In comparison with treadmill exercise, bicycle ergometer exercise appears to be a safer exercise stimulation mode for CPET in patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.