Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35795305›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Bronchodilator responsiveness and dysanapsis in bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Leif D Nelin, Matthew J Kielt, Maria Jebbia, Sudarshan Jadcherla, Edward G Shepherd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward precision for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Moving past current definitions.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  2. A quality improvement initiative to reduce excess inhaled therapy use in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leif D NelinComprehensive Center for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Nationwide Children's Hospital and Division of Neonatology, Dept of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3722-3035
Matthew J KieltComprehensive Center for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Nationwide Children's Hospital and Division of Neonatology, Dept of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-9070
Maria JebbiaComprehensive Center for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Nationwide Children's Hospital and Division of Neonatology, Dept of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sudarshan JadcherlaCenter for Perinatal Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Edward G ShepherdComprehensive Center for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Nationwide Children's Hospital and Division of Neonatology, Dept of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) following preterm birth is increasing. Bronchodilators are often used to treat patients with BPD with little evidence to guide therapy. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there are infant pulmonary function test (iPFT) parameters that can predict subsequent bronchodilator response in infants with BPD. Methods: Subjects in this study were part of a patient group in which we reported three BPD phenotypes (obstructive, restrictive and mixed) based on iPFT data. From that group, a cohort of 93 patients with iPFT data including bronchodilator response was eligible for this study. Results: Bronchodilator responsiveness was found in 59 people (63%) in the cohort. There were no differences in demographics between the responders and non-responders. There was no difference in forced vital capacity (FVC) between the two groups. Responders had significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 0.5 s (FEV Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that there are pulmonary function test parameters associated with bronchodilator response. Responders had evidence of greater dysanaptic lung growth than non-responders.

Identifiers

PMID35795305
PMCPMC9251368
OpenAlexW4283723427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.