Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794961›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2022

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors - Validity of Self-Report versus Plasma Concentrations and Pharmacy Dispensations - A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.

Marit Waaseth, Martina Havelkova, Guro Forsdahl, Eiliv Lund, Tomas Log

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marit WaasethDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-3972
Martina HavelkovaDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Guro ForsdahlDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9049-9463
Eiliv LundDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tomas LogNorthern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NONord University · NONorthern Norway Regional Health Authority · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To validate self-reported current use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC) and to identify factors associated with discordance between data sources. Material and Methods: This is a cross-sectional record-linkage study comparing SSRI-use derived from four data sources: 1) Specific SSRI questions in the main NOWAC questionnaire, 2) Open questions on medication use in the small questionnaire following blood samples, 3) plasma concentration measurements for a subsample, and 4) pharmacy dispensations from the Norwegian prescription database (NorPD) where current use of SSRI was defined by Legend Time Duration (LTD). Among 105 855 women, aged 46 to 64 years and randomly selected from the general population, 70,191 had data on SSRI-use from both NOWAC and NorPD. Plasma concentration was measured for 93 pairs of self-reported SSRI-users and non-users, with dispensation data available for 68 pairs. Validity was assessed by sensitivity and specificity; agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa. Factors associated with discordance between information sources were analyzed by multiple binary logistic regression. Results: We found high sensitivity (89.5%) and specificity (98.7%) for the specific questions in the main questionnaire compared with pharmacy dispensations. Measured against plasma concentrations, current SSRI-use defined by open questions and pharmacy dispensations both had high sensitivity (100% and 92.5%, respectively) and specificity (98.6% both). Agreements (kappa) were similarly high for all comparisons (≥0.80). The factors associated with discordance between data sources included poor health, comorbidity, being single and not being in full time work. Education was inversely associated with discordance. Conclusion: Self-reported current use of SSRI from the NOWAC questionnaires is highly valid and, according to plasma concentrations, perhaps even more so than pharmacy dispensations. Factors associated with discordance between information sources should be taken into account in the interpretation of future analyses which include SSRI-use in the NOWAC study.

Indexed as

agreementantidepressantspharmacy dispensationsplasma concentrationrecord linkageself-report

Identifiers

PMID35794961
PMCPMC9252190
OpenAlexW4285740044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.