Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794910›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

The State of Microbiology Diagnostic of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Europe: An In-Depth Survey Among Clinical Microbiologists.

Erlangga Yusuf, Charlotte Roschka, Jaime Esteban, Annibale Raglio, Anna Tisler, Philippe Willems, Tobias Siegfried Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Considerations for Implementation of Interdisciplinary Practice Changes.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Erlangga YusufDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Charlotte RoschkaInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Jaime EstebanClinical Microbiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz Foundation Health Research Institute, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Annibale RaglioUnit of Microbiology and Virology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Anna TislerInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Philippe WillemsDepartment of Microbiology, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tobias Siegfried KramerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEErasmus MC · NLGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to give an overview on how microbiology diagnosis tests of Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) is performed in Europe, and to explore whether any factor influences the decision on implementing a test. Methods: An extensive online survey of clinical microbiologists from seven European countries (Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Spain). Following items were assessed: (i). general information on the laboratory, (ii) preference of the laboratory and clinical microbiologists regarding samples, (iii) transportation and (iv) processing of explanted foreign bodies and tissues and synovial fluid, (v) culture media and culture duration, (vi) reporting (identification and susceptibility testing), and (vii) use of molecular microbiology techniques. Results: Invited were 163 clinical microbiologists. The response rate from each country was above 50% (range 51-78%), except for Germany (36%). Frequent PJI diagnostics were the use of tissue pre-processing (58.1%), culturing synovial fluid in blood culture bottles (45.5%), use of sonication for processing explanted prosthesis (56.8%), reporting the presence of synovial leukocyte counts (67%), use of blood aerobic and anaerobic agar (97.7%), and enrichment media thioglycolate (69.3%). The most common incubation time of the culture media is 7-14 days (34.1-70.5%). The clinicians were called to report the culture results (80.7%), and to give antibiotic recommendation (67%). Conclusion: There are common practices in processing PJI samples and reporting results, which is promising for harmonization of PJI diagnostic in the future. However, variation in diagnostic tests should also be considered in interpreting and comparing clinical microbiology results.

Indexed as

clinical microbiologycultureprosthetic joint infectionreportingsonicationsynovial fluid

Identifiers

PMID35794910
PMCPMC9251459
OpenAlexW4283217734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.