ArticleJournal of medical primatology2022
Developing and validating SARS-CoV-2 assays for nonhuman primate surveillance.
Article in Journal of medical primatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Role of Antibody Testing Using Commercially Available Reagents in Tuberculosis Surveillance Algorithms Being Developed for Nonhuman Primate Breeding Colonies.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
- Monitoring and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of laboratory rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Developing and validating SARS-CoV-2 assays for nonhuman primate surveillance.Journal of medical primatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn early 2020, the California National Primate Research Center implemented surveillance to address the threat of SARS-CoV-2 infection in its nonhuman primate colony. MATERIALS/
methodsTo detect antiviral antibodies, multi-antigen assays were developed and validated on enzyme immunoassay and multiplex microbead immunofluorescent assay (MMIA) platforms. To detect viral RNA, RT-PCR was also performed. RESULTS/
conclusionUsing a 4plex, antibody was identified in 16/16 experimentally infected animals; and specificity for spike, nucleocapsid, receptor binding domain, and whole virus antigens was 95.2%, 93.8%, 94.3%, and 97.1%, respectively on surveillance samples. Six laboratories compared this MMIA favorably with nine additional laboratory-developed or commercially available assays. Using a screen and confirm algorithm, 141 of the last 2441 surveillance samples were screen-reactive requiring confirmatory testing. Although 35 samples were reactive to either nucleocapsid or spike; none were reactive to both. Over 20 000 animals have been tested and no spontaneous infections have so far been confirmed across the NIH sponsored National Primate Research Centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.