ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study on the performance and early clinical outcomes of senior and junior orthopaedic surgeons in traditional versus robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- [Early follow-up study on three-dimensional-printed customized porous acetabular components for reconstructing extensive acetabular bone defects in primary total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- The future of robotic surgery in joint arthroplasty : Current platforms, emerging technologies and outlook for 2035.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Robotic-assisted hip and knee revision arthroplasty: A scoping review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Effect of segmental rim defect morphology on press-fit stability of the cementless acetabular cup: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
- Robot-assisted orthopedic surgeries around shoulder joint: where we are?Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with a Metal Augment: A Minimum Eight-Year Follow-Up Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted revision total joint arthroplasty: a state-of-the-art scoping review.EFORT open reviews · 2023Article
- A systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of the computer-assisted orthopedic system.Health care science · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRobotic-assisted technology may be useful in hip revision cases with acetabular defects. However, data on the use of robotic-assisted technology for such complex diseases is lacking. CASE PRESENTATION: This case study described the adoption of MAKO robotic-assisted treatment of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with severe acetabular defect (Paprosky type IIIB). Robotic-assisted technology accurately achieved preoperative planning; the acetabular component and augment were placed in the original position and angle as planned. Robotic-assisted acetabular reaming was successful in a single pass, preserving the remaining acetabular bone mass very well with no procedure-related complications. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 6 months postoperatively was 84 and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index was 24.
conclusionRobotic-assisted technology can help in the accurate reconstruction of acetabular defect in complex hip revision surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.