ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2022
A Retrospective Study of Risk Factors and Outcomes in the Surgical Management of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSlipped capital femoral epiphysis is commonly treated with in situ pinning (ISP) and more recently the modified Dunn procedure (MDP). This study retrospectively examines the preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications of patients treated with either ISP or MDP over a 12-year period.
methodsA single-center, retrospective review was conducted on patients diagnosed and surgically treated with slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 2004 to 2016. Patients must have had preoperative imaging and a minimum of 6 months of clinical follow-up. Six preoperative demographic data (age, sex, intensity of symptoms, stability, trauma, and severity of slip), surgical details, and treatment outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to identify pertinent preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications in each treatment group.
resultsA total of 129 hips in 98 patients were treated (118 with ISP and 11 with MDP). Complications developed in 12 hips. Six hips developed osteonecrosis, two hips developed osteonecrosis and chondrolysis, two hips developed osteonecrosis and slip progression, and two hips developed slip progression only. Four of the 11 hips (36.4%) treated with MDP developed complications; 8 of the 118 hips (6.8%) treated with ISP developed complications. DISCUSSION: Complications developed in 9.3% of hips treated with ISP or MDP, with a higher rate of complications observed in the MDP group compared with the ISP group. This study is limited by the small sample size of the cohort and the disproportion in the number of cases in each treatment group. A multicenter study with larger sample sizes will be required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.