ArticleBMC geriatrics2022
Staff-to-resident abuse in nursing homes: a scoping review.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global approaches to older abuse research in institutional care settings: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Employee background-check policies in long-term care facilities in the United States.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Routinized violence: examining long-term residential care workers' perspectives on involuntary treatment.The Gerontologist · 2026Article
- Certified nursing assistants' perceptions of and suggestions to prevent elder abuse in residential aged care facilities: a qualitative study in Hunan Province, China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Structural equation modeling for influencing factors with quality care behavior among nursing assistants: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Relative-to-resident abuse in Norwegian nursing homes: a cross-sectional exploratory study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Abuse in Canadian long-term care homes: a mixed methods study.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- The work status of nurses in long-term care institutions in elderly care: A qualitative descriptive study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Making Neglect Invisible: A Qualitative Study among Nursing Home Staff in Norway.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Focus on Liability of Residences for Elderly and Sick People: A Case Series and Medico-Legal Issues.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Status and influencing factors of elder neglect by geriatric nursing assistants in Chinese nursing homes: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElder abuse in long-term care is an important public health concern with social, health-related, and economic implications. Staff-to-resident abuse is of particular interest since institutions should protect residents' rights and prevent harm. To provide an up-to date comprehensive overview of staff-to-resident abuse in nursing homes, we performed a scoping review considering types of abuse, their prevalence and associated factors, descriptions, experiences, and preventive interventions.
methodsWe performed a scoping review following the framework provided by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO via Ovid, and Cochrane Library. Additionally, we performed free web searching using Google Scholar and checked relevant reviews. Two reviewers independently selected studies. We narratively synthesised the results.
resultsOut of 3876 references retrieved by our search, we included 46 studies in 47 reports. The prevalence rates of abuse varied widely, ranging from 0 to 93% depending on the type of abuse. Associated factors of abuse at the staff, resident, and nursing home level were evaluated inconsistently. Abuse was perceived ambiguous: even though it was considered unacceptable, it was underreported. We found only four studies addressing preventive interventions. Of these, four made recommendations for intervention development. Only one study with an experimental design examined a multi-component intervention including education and mutual support.
conclusionsThe review yielded heterogenous evidence not allowing a concrete conclusion on prevalence and associated factors. However, the results show the significance of the problem and indicate that there are associate factors of abuse that can be influenced by appropriate interventions. These are amongst other staff education, organisational culture, and conditions. Further research should investigate the composition and content of preventive interventions and their potential to reduce abusive behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.