Targeted molecular profiling of salivary duct carcinoma with rhabdoid features highlights parallels to other apocrine and discohesive neoplasms: which phenotype should drive classification?

backgroundSalivary duct carcinoma with rhabdoid features (SDC-RF) is a recently-described salivary gland tumor that bears striking histologic similarity to lobular carcinoma of the breast. While this tumor has an apocrine phenotype that supports classification as a variant of SDC, it infrequently arises in association with conventional SDC. Furthermore, discohesive architecture can be seen in non-apocrine salivary carcinomas, raising the possibility that discohesive growth should define a separate entity. In this study, we aimed to perform comprehensive molecular profiling of SDC-RF to better understand its pathogenesis and classification.

methodsWe documented the clinicopathologic features of 9 cases of SDC-RF and performed immunostains including AR, GCDFP, and e-cadherin on all cases. We also performed targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels on 7 cases that had sufficient tissue available.

resultsThe SDC-RF represented 8 men and 1 woman with a median age of 67 years (range 63-83 years) and included 6 parotid, 2 buccal, and 1 submandibular primary. All tumors were uniformly composed of discohesive cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; signet-ring cell features were seen in 2 cases. All tumors were also positive for AR (100%) and GCDFP (100%), and 7 tumors (78%) displayed lost or abnormal e-cadherin. NGS highlighted concomitant PIK3CA and HRAS mutations in 4 tumors, with additional cases harboring TP53, PTEN, and AKT1 mutations. Furthermore, CDH1 alterations were seen in 6 cases, including a novel CDH1::CORO7 fusion. Among 5 patients with follow-up available, 3 (60%) developed local recurrence and widespread distant metastasis and died of disease at a median 20 months (range 10-48 months).

conclusionsOverall, our findings confirm frequent CDH1 mutations and e-cadherin inactivation in SDC-RF, similar to discohesive tumors from other sites. We also highlight an apocrine molecular profile similar to conventional SDC. However, occasional AKT1 mutation and signet-ring features suggest SDC-RF may also be related to mucinous adenocarcinoma. As more salivary tumors with discohesive growth are identified, it may become clearer whether SDC-RF should remain in the SDC family or be recognized as a separate entity.