ArticleCell and tissue banking2023
Removal of collagen three-dimensional scaffold bubbles utilizing a vacuum suction technique.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The process of generating type I/II collagen scaffolds is fraught with bubble formation, which can interfere with the three-dimensional structure of the scaffold. Herein, we applied low-temperature vacuum freeze-drying to remove mixed air bubbles under negative pressure. Type I and II rubber sponges were acid-solubilized via acid lysis and enzymolysis. Thereafter, vacuum negative pressure was applied to remove bubbles, and the cover glass press method was applied to shape the type I/II original scaffold. Vacuum negative pressure was applied for a second time to remove any residual bubbles. Subsequent application of carbamide/N-hydroxysuccinimide cross-linked the scaffold. The traditional method was used as the control group. The structure and number of residual bubbles and pore sizes of the two scaffolds were compared. Based on the relationship between the pressure and the number of residual bubbles, a curve was created, and the time of ice formation was calculated. The bubble content of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The pore diameter of the type I/II collagen scaffold was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The time of icing effect of type I and II collagen solution was 136.54 ± 5.26 and 144.40 ± 6.45 s, respectively. The experimental scaffold had a more regular structure with actively proliferating chondrocytes that possessed adherent pseudopodia. The findings indicated that the vacuum negative pressure method did not affect the physical or chemical properties of collagen, and these scaffolds exhibited good biocompatibility with chondrocytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35794499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.