Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794480›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Action suppression reveals opponent parallel control via striatal circuits.

Bruno F Cruz, Gonçalo Guiomar, Sofia Soares, Asma Motiwala, Christian K Machens, Joseph J Paton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Addressing degeneracy in rodent studies of cognition.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Striatal ensembles specify and control granular forelimb actions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of Striatum in Controlling Waiting during Reactive and Self-Timed Behaviors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno F CruzChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal.
Gonçalo GuiomarChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal.
Sofia SoaresChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal.
Asma MotiwalaChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal.
Christian K MachensChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal.
Joseph J PatonChampalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, PT, Portugal. joe.paton@research.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-6455

Funding

European Research Council DYCOCIRC - REP-772339-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia are classically thought to promote and suppress action, respectively

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumModels, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionNeural PathwaysNeuronsAnimalsComputer SimulationMiceOptogenetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.