Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794442›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2022

Comparison of willingness and preference for genetic counseling via telemedicine: before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Camille O Allison, Sandra K Prucka, Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt, Benjamin M Helm, Melissa Lah, Leah Wetherill, Rebecca E Baud

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends in Telemedicine at a Cancer Center: Analyzing Sustained Use.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille O AllisonDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-7111
Sandra K PruckaDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-8148
Sara M Fitzgerald-ButtDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2316-2486
Benjamin M HelmDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5597-0202
Melissa LahDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2406-8961
Leah WetherillDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-9051
Rebecca E BaudDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. rbaud@iuhealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-3574
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required genetic counseling services, like most outpatient healthcare, to rapidly adopt a telemedicine model. Understanding the trends in patients' preferences for telemedicine relative to in-person service delivery both before and after the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic may aid in navigating how best to integrate telemedicine in a post-COVID-19 era. Our study explored how respondents' willingness to use, and preference for, telemedicine differed from before to after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents included patients, or their parent/guardian, seen in a general medical genetics clinic in 2018, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and in 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were surveyed regarding their willingness to use telemedicine, preference for telemedicine relative to in-person care, and the influence of various factors. Among 69 pre-COVID-19 and 40 current-COVID-19 respondents, there was no shift in willingness to use, or preference for, telemedicine across these time periods. About half of respondents (50.6%) preferred telemedicine visits for the future. Of the 49.4% who preferred in-person visits, 79.1% were still willing to have visits via telemedicine. Predictors of these preferences included comfort with technology and prioritization of convenience of location. This study suggests that a hybrid care model, utilizing telemedicine and in-person service delivery, may be most appropriate to meet the needs of the diverse patients served. Concern for COVID-19 was not found to predict willingness or preference, suggesting that our findings may be generalizable in post-pandemic contexts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Genetic counselingPatient preferenceTelegeneticsTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35794442
PMCPMC9261179
OpenAlexW4284880689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.