Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794434›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2022

Considering vocational training as selection criterion for medical students: evidence for predictive validity.

Dorothee Amelung, Simon Zegota, Lia Espe, Tim Wittenberg, Tobias Raupach, Martina Kadmon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interactional competencies in medical student admission- what makes a "good medical doctor"?Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothee AmelungMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Dorothee.Amelung@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9534-0136
Simon ZegotaMedical Faculty, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany.
Lia EspeMedical Faculty, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim WittenbergMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias RaupachMedical Faculty, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany.
Martina KadmonMedical Faculty, Augsburg University, Augsburg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior work experience in a relevant medical profession is an important admission criterion currently used at many German medical schools in addition to cognitive criteria. In other countries, work experience is often considered in later admission stages (e.g., interviews with pre-selected subgroups of applicants). However, evidence for its predictive validity for study success in addition to cognitive admission criteria is currently lacking. We therefore assessed whether completed vocational training in a relevant medical profession can predict study performance in the first two years of study in addition to cognitive admission criteria. Admission and study performance data of all currently enrolled medical students at two German medical schools (Göttingen and Heidelberg) beginning with the 2013/14 cohort were retrospectively analyzed. Cognitive admission criteria in our sample were GPA grades and a cognitive test ("Test für Medizinische Studiengänge", TMS). We defined the study outcome parameter as the mean percentile rank over all performance data points over the first two years of study for each location, respectively. A multi-level model with varying intercepts by location, GPA, TMS, vocational training, and sex as predictors accounted for 14.5% of the variance in study outcome. A positive predictive association with study outcome was found for vocational training (ß = 0.33, p = .008) beyond GPA (ß = 0.38, p < .001) and TMS (ß = 0.26, p < .001). Our results support the use of prior vocational training as a selection criterion for medical studies potentially adding predictive validity to cognitive criteria.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalEducational MeasurementHumansRetrospective StudiesSchool Admission CriteriaSchools, MedicalVocational EducationAdmission criteriaMedical schoolMedical student selectionMulticenter studyProfessional experienceVocational training

Identifiers

PMID35794434
PMCPMC9606097
OpenAlexW4283833529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.