Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794403›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Ilaria Amodeo, Irene Borzani, Genny Raffaeli, Nicola Persico, Giacomo Simeone Amelio, Silvia Gulden, Mariarosa Colnaghi, Eduardo Villamor, Fabio Mosca, Giacomo Cavallaro

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilaria Amodeo *Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Irene Borzani *Pediatric Radiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Genny RaffaeliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Nicola PersicoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo Simeone AmelioNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Silvia GuldenNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Mariarosa ColnaghiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Eduardo VillamorDepartment of Pediatrics, School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, University of Maastricht, MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Fabio MoscaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo CavallaroNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Della Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy. giacomo.cavallaro@policlinico.mi.it.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has largely increased our knowledge and predictive accuracy of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in the fetus. Thanks to its technical advantages, better anatomical definition, and superiority in fetal lung volume estimation, fetal MRI has been demonstrated to be superior to 2D and 3D ultrasound alone in CDH diagnosis and outcome prediction. This is of crucial importance for prenatal counseling, risk stratification, and decision-making approach. Furthermore, several quantitative and qualitative parameters can be evaluated simultaneously, which have been associated with survival, postnatal course severity, and long-term morbidity.

conclusionFetal MRI will further strengthen its role in the near future, but it is necessary to reach a consensus on indications, methodology, and data interpretation. In addition, it is required data integration from different imaging modalities and clinical courses, especially for predicting postnatal pulmonary hypertension. This would lead to a comprehensive prognostic assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • MRI plays a key role in evaluating the fetal lung in patients with CDH. • Prognostic assessment of CDH is challenging, and advanced imaging is crucial for a complete prenatal assessment and counseling. WHAT IS NEW: • Fetal MRI has strengthened its role over ultrasound due to its technical advantages, better anatomical definition, superior fetal lung volume estimation, and outcome prediction. • Imaging and clinical data integration is the most desirable strategy and may provide new MRI applications and future research opportunities.

Indexed as

Hernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalFemaleFetusHumansLungLung Volume MeasurementsMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, PrenatalCongenital diaphragmatic herniaLiver herniation percentageLiver-to-thoracic volume ratioMediastinal shift angleObserved/expected total fetal lung volumePulmonary hypertensionSurvivalTotal fetal lung volume

Identifiers

PMID35794403
PMCPMC9395465
OpenAlexW4284882452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.