Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794376›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

Effects of physiological fluctuations on the estimation of vascular flow in eyes with idiopathic macular pucker.

Rino Frisina, Gabriella De Salvo, Luigi Tozzi, Irene Gius, Jean-Yves Sahyoun, Barbara Parolini, Alessandro Meduri

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rino FrisinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0247-2680
Gabriella De SalvoEye Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. gabrielladesalvo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-6942
Luigi TozziDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Irene GiusDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-2695
Jean-Yves SahyounDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universite' de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1437-501X
Barbara ParoliniEyecare Clinic, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro MeduriBiomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Images Sciences, Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the macular vascular flow in eyes with idiopathic macular pucker (Eye

methods40 eyes of 40 patients were recruited. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and OCT-angiography parameters were central foveal thickness (CFT), choroidal thickness (CT), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel area density (VAD), vessel length fraction (VLF), vessel density index (VDI) of superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep vascular complex (DVC), choriocapillaris (CC) flow. Absolute and relative difference calculation was applied to evaluate macular vascular flow in Eye FOLLOW-UP: 6 months.

resultsBCVA improved (p = 0.003) in all cases following surgery. CFT reduced postoperatively (p = 0.0138). FAZ area was smaller in Eye

conclusionsVascular flow indices monitoring demonstrated significant changes in both eyes: Eye

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneMacula LuteaFluorescein AngiographyHumansRetinal VesselsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID35794376
PMCPMC10169772
OpenAlexW4283828718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.