Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794119›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

ArtSeg-Artifact segmentation and removal in brightfield cell microscopy images without manual pixel-level annotations.

Mohammed A S Ali, Kaspar Hollo, Tõnis Laasfeld, Jane Torp, Maris-Johanna Tahk, Ago Rinken, Kaupo Palo, Leopold Parts, Dmytro Fishman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain organoid data synthesis and evaluation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed A S Ali *Department of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-4703
Kaspar Hollo *Department of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-2268
Tõnis Laasfeld *Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-3047
Jane TorpInstitute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-8483
Maris-Johanna TahkInstitute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-9192
Ago RinkenInstitute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Ravila 14a, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-7238-749X
Kaupo PaloPerkinElmer Cellular Technologies Germany GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2957-4660
Leopold PartsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009, Tartu, Estonia. leopold.parts@ut.ee.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-670X
Dmytro FishmanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Narva mnt 18, 51009, Tartu, Estonia. dmytro.fishman@ut.ee.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-8893

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (206194)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brightfield cell microscopy is a foundational tool in life sciences. The acquired images are prone to contain visual artifacts that hinder downstream analysis, and automatically removing them is therefore of great practical interest. Deep convolutional neural networks are state-of-the-art for image segmentation, but require pixel-level annotations, which are time-consuming to produce. Here, we propose ScoreCAM-U-Net, a pipeline to segment artifactual regions in brightfield images with limited user input. The model is trained using only image-level labels, so the process is faster by orders of magnitude compared to pixel-level annotation, but without substantially sacrificing the segmentation performance. We confirm that artifacts indeed exist with different shapes and sizes in three different brightfield microscopy image datasets, and distort downstream analyses such as nuclei segmentation, morphometry and fluorescence intensity quantification. We then demonstrate that our automated artifact removal ameliorates this problem. Such rapid cleaning of acquired images using the power of deep learning models is likely to become a standard step for all large scale microscopy experiments.

Indexed as

ArtifactsMicroscopyCell NucleusNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35794119
PMCPMC9259686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.