Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35794071›Full record

ReviewContact dermatitis2022

Preservatives in non-cosmetic products: Increasing human exposure requires action for protection of health.

Carola Lidén, Niklas Andersson, Ian R White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contact dermatitis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carola LidénInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-5896
Niklas AnderssonInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9785-7462
Ian R WhiteCutaneous Allergy, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-4635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of skin sensitizing preservatives is well-known. Contact allergy to preservatives is often caused by their presence in cosmetic products. Preservative use in non-cosmetic products is less well-known. We have reviewed European Union (EU) legislations on classification and labelling, biocides and cosmetics, concerning conditions for use of the most used sensitizing preservatives (including formaldehyde-releasing substances, isothiazolinones and parabens). We have analysed temporal trends in their use in non-cosmetic products (tonnes, number of products, concentrations), based on annual reports to the Swedish Products Register 1995-2018; and we discuss implications for stakeholders. Major changes over time are that the use of most of the preservatives has increased by tonnes and/or by number of products, and that several use concentrations have declined following harmonized classification as a skin sensitizer with low concentration limits for this classification. We conclude that the massive increase in use of preservatives is alarming, and that urgent action is needed for protection of health. Their use in non-cosmetic products is broad, increasing and often undisclosed. In the EU, legislations concerning chemicals can provide relevant restrictions to reduce their use and associated health risks, monitored by efficient surveillance. Prevention would be benefited by better coordination between legislations.

Indexed as

CosmeticsDermatitis, Allergic ContactDisinfectantsFormaldehydeHumansParabensPreservatives, PharmaceuticalCosmeticsDisinfectantsFormaldehydeParabensPreservatives, Pharmaceuticalbiocideexposureformaldehyde releaserisothiazolinonelegislationpreventionskin sensitizationtemporal trend

Identifiers

PMID35794071
PMCPMC9796024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.