Trial reportESC heart failure2022
Efficacy and safety of intravenous OPC-61815 compared with oral tolvaptan in patients with congestive heart failure.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- ADA-HF: acetazolamide as a chloride sparing diuretic in patients admitted to hospital with heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of intravenous OPC-61815 compared with oral tolvaptan in patients with congestive heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2022Trial
- Tolvaptan in heart failure: Contemporary evidence and a framework for precision decongestion.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Utility of tolvaptan sodium phosphate for refractory fluid retention in post-transplant sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.International journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of the acute reactiveness to intravenous administration of tolvaptan sodium phosphate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Preliminary Report of Intravenous Tolvaptan Sodium Phosphate (SamtasJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Effects of door-to-tolvaptan time on short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Observational
- Association between worsening renal function severity during hospitalization and low physical function at discharge: a retrospective cohort study of older patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease from Japan.European geriatric medicine · 2023Article
- Organ dysfunction, injury, and failure in cardiogenic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
- Initial clinical experience of intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate in patients with congestive heart failure.Journal of cardiology cases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis multicentre, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group Phase III study was conducted to confirm the non-inferiority of OPC-61815 (tolvaptan sodium phosphate) intravenous injections to oral tolvaptan tablets in patients with congestive heart failure and volume overload despite receiving diuretics other than vasopressin antagonists. METHODS AND
resultsCongestive heart failure patients with volume overload despite receiving diuretics other than vasopressin antagonists were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive OPC-61815 (16-mg injection; n = 149) or oral tolvaptan (15-mg tablet; n = 145) once daily for 5 days. Most patients were male; the mean age and weight were 74.7 years and 62.1 kg, respectively; other demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. In this study, the primary endpoint was the change in body weight from baseline to the day after the last dose. Secondary endpoints included improvement from baseline in congestive findings and New York Heart Association classification. The change in body weight was -1.67 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.93, -1.41] and -1.36 kg (95% CI: -1.62, -1.10) in the OPC-61815 group and tolvaptan group, respectively; the difference in the least squares mean between the groups was -0.31 kg (95% CI: -0.68, 0.06). Given the upper CI did not exceed the pre-specified limit of 0.48, this confirmed the non-inferiority of injectable OPC-61815 to oral tolvaptan. Daily urine volume and daily fluid intake increased, and daily fluid balance was negative throughout the treatment period; changes were similar for both groups. All evaluated congestive symptoms and New York Heart Association classifications showed improvement and safety findings were similar between the groups. The incidence of hyperkalaemia was higher in the OPC-61815 group, and the incidence of thirst and dry mouth was higher in the tolvaptan group. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate; one serious treatment-emergent adverse event of hyperkalaemia in the OPC-61815 group was considered treatment related.
conclusionsOPC-61815 (16-mg injection) was confirmed as non-inferior to oral tolvaptan (15-mg tablet) in patients with congestive heart failure and inadequate response to diuretics; no new safety concerns were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.