Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793961›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023

A Prospective Study of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel in Patients with Borderline-resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Naohiro Okano, Ryota Matsuki, Masao Toki, Koichi Gondo, Kazushige Ochiai, Shunsuke Watanabe, Hidekatsu Tateishi, Masaharu Kogure, Yutaka Suzuki, Masanori Sugiyama and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naohiro OkanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Ryota MatsukiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Japan.
Masao TokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Koichi GondoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Kazushige OchiaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Shunsuke WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Hidekatsu TateishiDepartment of Radiology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Masaharu KogureDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Japan.
Yutaka SuzukiDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Japan.
Masanori SugiyamaTokyo Rosai Hospital, Japan.
Fumio NagashimaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Junji ShibaharaDepartment of Pathology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Yoshihiro SakamotoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Japan.
Junji FuruseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Kyorin University · JPKyorin University Hospital · JPTokyo Rosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection improves the borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) prognosis; however, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showed a high anti-tumor effect in primary lesions in a prospective study for metastatic disease. However, evidence concerning its feasibility is still lacking in patients with BRPC. We therefore evaluated the tolerability of neoadjuvant GnP (NAC-GnP) for BRPC. Methods This single-center prospective study evaluated 10 patients with BRPC who were treated with two cycles of NAC-GnP. The primary endpoint was feasibility for NAC-GnP. Treatment feasibility was defined as a successful outcome in at least eight patients. Results Ten patients who had BRPC in contact with the celiac artery (n=5), superior mesenteric artery (n=3), or hepatic artery (n=2) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 40-82) years old. Grade 3 anorexia and grade 2 pneumonia occurred in one patient each, so treatment was feasible in eight patients. The median primary tumor reduction and response rates were 33% (range, 0-68%) and 60%, respectively. Six of eight patients who had abnormal CA19-9 levels at the time of enrolment showed a decrease in CA19-9 levels, with a median decrease of 72%. Five patients underwent radical resection, including R0 resection in four. Postoperative grade IIIa Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in one patient (upper gastrointestinal bleeding and pancreatic fistula). Conclusion Two-cycle NAC-GnP is a feasible treatment for patients with BRPC. Further studies on NAC-GnP in patients with BRPC are warranted.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProspective Studies130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelborderline resectablechemotherapypancreatic ductal adenocarcinomasurgery

Identifiers

PMID35793961
PMCPMC9970803
OpenAlexW4284894563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.