Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793958›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023

Frequency of Difficult Patient Encounters in a Japanese University Hospital and Community Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study.

Kiyoshi Shikino, Tsutomu Mito, Yoshiyuki Ohira, Daiki Yokokawa, Yota Katsuyama, Takahiro Ota, Eri Sato, Yuta Hirose, Shiho Yamashita, Shingo Suzuki and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Are Difficult Inpatients Also Difficult Primary Care Patients?Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kiyoshi ShikinoDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Tsutomu MitoDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Yoshiyuki OhiraDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Daiki YokokawaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Yota KatsuyamaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Takahiro OtaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Eri SatoDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Yuta HiroseDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Shiho YamashitaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Shingo SuzukiDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Kazutaka NodaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Takanori UeharaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Masatomi IkusakaDepartment of General Medicine, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Difficult patient encounters (DPEs) are defined as encounters with patients causing strong negative feelings in physicians. In primary care settings, DPEs account for approximately 15% of visits among outpatients. To our knowledge, this is the first epidemiological study of DPEs in Japan. Methods We conducted a survey of 8 physicians (5.0±2 years of clinical experience) who examined first-visit patients ≥15 years old with clinical symptoms at the Department of General Medicine in Chiba University Hospital and 4 community hospitals over a 2-month period since December 2015. Materials We evaluated 10-Item Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10) scores (DPE ≥31 points; non-DPE ≤30 points) and patient age, sex, and presence of psychological or social problems. Results The valid response rate was 98.9% (94/95) and 98.4% (189/192) in the university and community hospitals, respectively. The percentage of DPEs was 39.8% (37/93) and 15.0% (26/173) in the university and community hospitals, respectively; the percentage of DPEs was significantly higher at the university hospital than at the community hospitals (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with psychosocial problems was significantly higher in the DPE group than in the non-DPE group (93.7% vs. 40.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion Our findings were similar to those reported in primary care settings in other countries in community hospital outpatient and general internal medicine departments, where patients are mostly non-referrals, although the values were higher in university hospital general medicine departments, where patients were mostly referrals. Patients involved in DPEs have a high rate of psychological and social problems.

Indexed as

Hospitals, CommunityPhysician-Patient RelationsCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleHospitals, UniversityHumansdifficult patient encountersoutpatientprimary careuniversity hospital

Identifiers

PMID35793958
PMCPMC10017258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.