Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793934›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2022

Radiation Dose Reduction and Surgical Efficiency Improvement in Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Assisted by Intraoperative O-arm Navigation: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Junfeng Gong, Xinle Huang, Liwen Luo, Huan Liu, Hao Wu, Ying Tan, Changqing Li, Yu Tang, Yue Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Endoscopic spine surgery.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Junfeng GongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinle HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Liwen LuoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Huan LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hao WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ying TanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Changqing LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yu TangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

Army Medical University 2018JSLC0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) has gained increasing popularity among spine surgeons. However, with the use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative radiation exposure remains a major concern. Here, we aim to introduce Endo-TLIF assisted by O-arm-based navigation and compare the results between O-arm navigation and fluoroscopy groups.

methodsSixty-four patients were retrospectively analyzed from May 2019 to September 2020; the nonnavigation group comprised 34 patients, and the navigation group comprised 30 patients. Data on radiation dose, blood loss, postoperative drains, surgery time, complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were collected. Clinical outcomes were evaluated from postoperative data such as fusion rate, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiation dose and surgery time were selected as primary outcomes; the others were second outcomes.

resultsAll patients were followed up for at least 12 months. No significant differences were detected in intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative drains, hospital LOS, or complications between the 2 groups. The radiation dose was significantly lower in the navigation group compared with the nonnavigation group. The time of cannula placement and pedicle screw fixation was significantly reduced in the navigation group. No significant differences were detected between the clinical outcomes in the 2 groups (VAS and ODI scores).

conclusionThe present study demonstrates that O-arm-assisted Endo-TLIF is efficient and safe. Compared with fluoroscopy, O-arm navigation could reduce the radiation exposure and surgical time in Endo-TLIF surgery, with similar clinical outcomes. However, the higher doses exposed to patients remains a negative effect of this technology.

Indexed as

Endo-TLIF surgeryFluoroscopyO-arm devicePercutaneous pathwayRadiation exposureSurgery time

Identifiers

PMID35793934
PMCPMC9260536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.