Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793676›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Medicine2022

Prenatal genetics in a post-Roe United States.

Megan A Allyse, Marsha Michie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trust As the Foundation for Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Women's Concerns and Experiences of Fetal Anomaly Screening Process: A Qualitative Study.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan A AllyseProgram in Biomedical Ethics and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: allyse.megan@mayo.edu.
Marsha MichieDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Ensuring Patients' Informed Access to Noninvasive Prenatal TestingR01HG010092 · NHGRI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Ruth Farrell · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Prenatal Preparation: Actions and ResultsR01HG009668 · NHGRI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHIE, MARSHA MABRY · 2019 to 2022
$3.0M
Supplement to Framework for Advances in Reprogenomics Ethics & Regulation (FAIRER)R01HG011480 · NHGRI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FARRELL, RUTH, MICHIE, MARSHA MABRY · 2021 to 2023
$1.9M
Factors Influencing Access and Utilization of Genetic Prenatal Care Services Among Women from Underserved PopulationsK01HG009542 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALLYSE, MEGAN A. · 2018 to 2022
$809k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG009542NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009668NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010092NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Supreme Court removed a federal right to abortion access in June 2022. This returned the legality of abortion to each of the 50 states. This will have a profound impact on the provision of prenatal care in general and prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, LegalFemaleHumansPregnancySupreme Court DecisionsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35793676
PMCPMC9381413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.