Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793471›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2022

Systemic treatment of children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis aged ≥2 years: a Delphi consensus project mapping expert opinion in Northern Europe.

M de Graaf, S R Janmohamed, M L A Schuttelaar, T Agner, J H Alfonso, S De Schepper, M Deleuran, K Despontin, V Elenius, P-D Ghislain and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Improving Psychological Health Outcomes in Children with Atopic Dermatitis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

M de GraafDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S R JanmohamedDepartment of Dermatology, Unit Pediatric Dermatology, SKIN Research Group, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-480X
M L A SchuttelaarDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
T AgnerDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8299
J H AlfonsoDepartment of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
S De SchepperDepartment of Dermatology, Gent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
M DeleuranDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
K DespontinDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, CHU UCL Namur, Namur, Belgium.
V EleniusDepartment of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
P-D GhislainDepartment of Dermatology, UCL St-Luc, Louvain University, Brussels, Belgium.
L HuilajaPEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-4323
E K JohanssonDermatology and Venereology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
B K KvenshagenDepartment of Paediatrics, Østfold Hospital, Grålum, Norway.
J M MandelinDepartment of Dermatology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
H OlsetDepartment of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
A SvenssonDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2821-7418
A M van Tuyll van SerooskerkenHagaZiekenhuis/Juliana Kinderziekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J P ThyssenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1743
C VestergaardDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-3158
Aarhus University Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEGhent University Hospital · BEHaga Hospital · NLHaukeland University Hospital · NOHelsinki University Hospital · FIKarolinska University Hospital · SELund University · SEOslo University Hospital · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NOOulu University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Namur · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Sanofi Genzyme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) can be burdensome, affecting mental health and impairing quality of life for children and caregivers. Comprehensive guidelines exist for managing paediatric AD, but practical guidance on using systemic therapy is limited, particularly for new therapies including biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, recently approved for various ages in this indication.

objectivesThis expert consensus aimed to provide practical recommendations within this advancing field to enhance clinical decision-making on the use of these and other systemics for children and adolescents aged ≥2 years with moderate-to-severe AD.

methodsNineteen physicians from Northern Europe were selected for their expertise in managing childhood AD. Using a two-round Delphi process, they reached full or partial consensus on 37 statements.

resultsSystemic therapy is recommended for children aged ≥2 years with a clear clinical diagnosis of severe AD and persistent disease uncontrolled after optimizing non-systemic therapy. Systemic therapy should achieve long-term disease control and reduce short-term interventions. Recommended are cyclosporine A for short-term use (all ages) and dupilumab or methotrexate for long-term use (ages ≥6 years). Consensus was not reached on the best long-term systemics for children aged 2-6 years, although new systemic therapies will likely become favourable: New biologics and JAK inhibitors will soon be approved for this age group, and more trial and real-world data will become available.

conclusionsThis article makes practical recommendations on the use of systemic AD treatments for children and adolescents, to supplement international and regional guidelines. It considers the systemic medication that was available for children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD at the time this consensus project was done: azathioprine, cyclosporine A, dupilumab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and oral glucocorticosteroids. We focus on the geographically similar Northern European countries, whose healthcare systems, local preferences for AD management and reimbursement structures nonetheless differ significantly.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDermatitis, AtopicJanus Kinase InhibitorsAdolescentAzathioprineChildChild, PreschoolCyclosporineDelphi TechniqueHumansJanus KinasesMethotrexateMycophenolic AcidQuality of LifeAzathioprineBiological ProductsCyclosporineJanus Kinase InhibitorsJanus KinasesMethotrexateMycophenolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35793471
PMCPMC9796032
OpenAlexW4284884782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.