Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Efficient and cost-effective non-invasive population monitoring as a method to assess the genetic diversity of the last remaining population of Amur leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) in the Russia Far East.

Sujoo Cho, Puneet Pandey, Jee Yun Hyun, Taisia Marchenkova, Anna Vitkalova, Timophey Petrov, Daecheol Jeong, Jangmi Lee, Dong Youn Kim, Ying Li and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Tufted Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. First mitogenome phylogeny of the sun bearEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Sujoo ChoResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Puneet PandeyResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5891-3927
Jee Yun HyunResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Taisia MarchenkovaFederal State Budgetary Institution Joint Directorate of Kedrovaya Pad' State Biosphere Nature Reserve and Land of the Leopard National Park, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2857-6960
Anna VitkalovaFederal State Budgetary Institution Joint Directorate of Kedrovaya Pad' State Biosphere Nature Reserve and Land of the Leopard National Park, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.
Timophey PetrovFederal State Budgetary Institution Joint Directorate of Kedrovaya Pad' State Biosphere Nature Reserve and Land of the Leopard National Park, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.
Daecheol JeongResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jangmi LeeResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Youn KimResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2673-0445
Ying LiResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yury DarmanWWF-Russia, Amur Branch, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.
Mi-Sook MinResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung Seok KimDepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Victor BardyukFederal State Budgetary Institution Joint Directorate of Kedrovaya Pad' State Biosphere Nature Reserve and Land of the Leopard National Park, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia.
Hang LeeResearch Institute for Veterinary Science and Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRMinistry of Natural Resources and Environment · RUIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small populations of the endangered species are more vulnerable to extinction and hence require periodic genetic monitoring to establish and revisit the conservation strategies. The Amur leopard is critically endangered with about 100 individuals in the wild. In this study, we developed a simple and cost-effective noninvasive genetic monitoring protocol for Amur leopards. Also, we investigated the impact of fecal sample's age, storage, and collection season on microsatellite genotyping success and data quality. We identified 89 leopard scats out of the 342 fecal samples collected from Land of the Leopard between 2014-2019. Microsatellite genotyping using 12 markers optimized in 3 multiplex PCR reactions reveals presence of at least 24 leopard individuals (18 males and 6 females). There was a significant difference in the success rate of genotyping depending on the time from feces deposition to collection (p = 0.014, Fisher's exact test), with better genotyping success for samples having <2 weeks of environmental exposure. Amur leopard genetic diversity was found low (Ho- 0.33, HE- 0.35, and NA- 2.57) with no visible population substructure and recent bottleneck signature. Although a historical bottleneck footprint was observed. Mitochondrial DNA diversity was also found low with two haplotypes differing by a point mutation reported in 1,769 bp of investigated sequence covering parts of cytochrome b gene (846 bp), NADH-5 gene (611 bp) and control region (312 bp). We recommend periodic genetic monitoring of wild Amur leopards following the proposed methodology to achieve cost effectiveness and efficiency.

Indexed as

PantheraAnimalsAsia, EasternCost-Benefit AnalysisEndangered SpeciesFemaleGenetic VariationMale

Identifiers

PMID35793341
PMCPMC9258825
OpenAlexW4285411168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.