Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35793162›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022

Faecal incontinence is associated with an impaired rectosigmoid brake and improved by sacral neuromodulation.

Anthony Y Lin, Chris Varghese, Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel, Sean Seo, Peng Du, Phil Dinning, Ian P Bissett, Greg O'Grady

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Faecal incontinence is associated with an impaired rectosigmoid brake and improved by sacral neuromodulation.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony Y LinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1962-860X
Chris VargheseDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-8639
Niranchan PaskaranandavadivelAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sean SeoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-7084
Peng DuAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Phil DinningDepartment of Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Ian P BissettDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6530-2454
Greg O'GradyDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-1080
University of Auckland · NZFlinders University · AU

Funding

Health Research Council of New ZealandRoyal Australasian College of Surgeons
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rectosigmoid brake, characterised by retrograde cyclic motor patterns on high-resolution colonic manometry, has been postulated as a contributor to the maintenance of bowel continence. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an effective therapy for faecal incontinence, but its mechanism of action is unclear. This study aims to investigate the colonic motility patterns in the distal colon of patients with faecal incontinence, and how these are modulated by SNM.

methodsA high-resolution fibreoptic colonic manometry catheter, containing 36 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned in patients with faecal incontinence undergoing stage 1 SNM. One hour of pre- and post meal recordings were obtained followed by pre- and post meal recordings with suprasensory SNM. A 700-kcal meal was given. Data were analysed to identify propagating contractions.

resultsFifteen patients with faecal incontinence were analysed. Patients had an abnormal meal response (fewer retrograde propagating contractions compared to controls; p = 0.027) and failed to show a post meal increase in propagating contractions (mean 17 ± 6/h premeal vs. 22 ± 9/h post meal, p = 0.438). Compared to baseline, SNM significantly increased the number of retrograde propagating contractions in the distal colon (8 ± 3/h premeal vs. 14 ± 3/h premeal with SNM, p = 0.028). Consuming a meal did not further increase the number of propagating contractions beyond the baseline upregulating effect of SNM.

conclusionThe rectosigmoid brake was suppressed in this cohort of patients with faecal incontinence. SNM may exert a therapeutic effect by modulating this rectosigmoid brake.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinenceColonHumansLumbosacral PlexusRectumTreatment Outcomefaecal incontinenceimplantrectosigmoid brakesacral nerve stimulationsacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID35793162
PMCPMC10084032
OpenAlexW4284665290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.