ArticleJAMA surgery2022
Extended Focal Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer With High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy and Safety of Composite Steep-pulse(High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation) Treatment Apparatus Used in Prostate Cancer Ablation Therapy : a Multicenter, Single-arm, Objective Performance Criteria Trial
Safety and Feasibility of Irreversible Electroporation for Early-stage Breast Cancer: a Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- High-frequency irreversible electroporation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (GIANT): a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Irreversible electroporation in focal therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future directions.Prostate international · 2026Review
- Integrated Diagnosis and Therapy Using Flexible Contact Electrodes: Low-Voltage Irreversible Electroporation and Quantitative Assessment of Therapeutic Efficacy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Intranasal vs. Device-Assisted Drug Delivery: Advantages and Limitations for the Delivery of Biopharmaceuticals to the CNS.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Spatial multiomics reveals irreversible electroporation-induced immuno-metabolic characteristics of the inflammatory margin in liver cancer.Communications biology · 2026Article
- High-voltage electrical pulses for pancreatic cancer treatment in the era of precision medicine.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Review
- Efficacy of neoadjuvant novel hormonal therapy combined with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer and analysis of biochemical recurrence-free survival.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Focal irreversible electroporation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Review
- Optilume drug-coated balloon dilation for treatment of post-prostate cancer ablative therapy urethral stricture: a case series.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- New experimental therapies for glioblastoma: a review of preclinical research.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Review
- Hydrodissection using 10% dextrose before focal therapy of prostate cancer: Initial experience.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Review
- Real-world safety of irreversible electroporation therapy for tumors with nanoknife: MAUDE database analysis.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Postoperative Refractory Diarrhea After Margin Accentuation of the Superior Mesenteric Artery with Irreversible Electroporation in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transient Lymphatic Remodeling Follows Sub-Ablative High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation Therapy in a 4T1 Murine Model.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Case study: Pulsed electric field ablation for salvage prostate cancer ablation.Urology case reports · 2025Article
- Irreversible Electroporation for the Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Irreversible electroporation combined with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy promotes tumor antigen-specific CD8World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Focal therapy of prostate cancer must balance the oncologic outcome and functional outcome. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) can destroy cancer cells while selectively preserving surrounding nerves and blood vessels, but no clinical trials have been conducted, to our knowledge. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of H-FIRE in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-group, objective performance criteria, nonrandomized controlled trial. Recruitment began on May 2, 2018, and ended March 27, 2019. The follow-up duration was 6 months. This was a multicenter trial conducted at 4 tertiary teaching hospitals in China. Patients with low or intermediate risk of biochemical recurrence of localized and locally advanced PCa were eligible. Key inclusion criteria were serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 20 ng/mL, clinical stage of T2c or less, and Gleason score of 7 or less. Data were analyzed from January 20 to February 20, 2021. Intervention: H-FIRE ablation of all lesions identified with biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 6-month clinically significant PCa (csPCa), which was defined as any biopsy core with Gleason score of greater than or equal to 7, or Gleason score of 6 plus maximum cancer core length of greater than 3 mm or an increase from the original cancer burden. Secondary outcomes were calculated in patients who actually received H-FIRE treatment. Results: A total of 117 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [62-73] years) were recruited from 4 centers, and 109 patients (27 [24.8%] low risk and 82 [75.2%] intermediate risk) actually received H-FIRE. Median (IQR) PSA level was 9.0 (6.0-12.7) ng/mL. Among the 100 patients who underwent biopsy at 6 months, the 6-month csPCa rate was 6.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-12.6%; P < .001; 1 in the treatment zone and 5 outside the treatment zone). Superiority criteria vs the historical control of 20% was achieved. PCa was detected in 14 patients, with a Gleason score of 7 in 2 patients and 6 in the remaining 12 patients. At 6 months, median (IQR) PSA level was 1.08 (0.4-3.2) ng/mL, median (IQR) International Prostate Symptom Score was 4.5 (2.0-9.5), and median (IQR) International Index of Erectile Function 5 score was 2.0 (0.5-12.5). Superiority vs the 20% historical control was also met in the subgroup analysis that only included the 57 patients with Gleason score of 7 at baseline (3.5% 6-month csPCa; 95% CI, 0.4%-12.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: The rate of 6-month csPCa with H-FIRE ablation was lower than the historical control using other energy platforms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03838432.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.