ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
Toward automatic reformation at the orbitomeatal line in head computed tomography using object detection algorithm.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-operator agreement and temporal reproducibility of automatically and manually generated multiplanar reconstruction axial images on head CT.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Estimation of Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fractions from cine-MRI Using 3D-CNN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consistent cross-sectional imaging is desirable to accurately detect lesions and facilitate follow-up in head computed tomography (CT). However, manual reformation causes image variations among technologists and requires additional time. We therefore developed a system that reformats head CT images at the orbitomeatal (OM) line and evaluated the system performance using real-world clinical data. Retrospective data were obtained for 681 consecutive patients who underwent non-contrast head CT. The datasets were randomly divided into one of three sets for training, validation, or testing. Four landmarks (bilateral eyes and external auditory canal) were detected with the trained You Look Only Once (YOLO)v5 model, and the head CT images were reformatted at the OM line. The precision, recall, and mean average precision at the intersection over union threshold of 0.5 were computed in the validation sets. The reformation quality in testing sets was evaluated by three radiological technologists on a qualitative 4-point scale. The precision, recall, and mean average precision of the trained YOLOv5 model for all categories were 0.688, 0.949, and 0.827, respectively. In our environment, the mean implementation time was 23.5 ± 2.4 s for each case. The qualitative evaluation in the testing sets showed that post-processed images of automatic reformation had clinically useful quality with scores 3 and 4 in 86.8%, 91.2%, and 94.1% for observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Our system demonstrated acceptable quality in reformatting the head CT images at the OM line using an object detection algorithm and was highly time efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35793033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.