Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792993›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2022

Is There a "Window of Opportunity" for Flexibility Development in Youth? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Olyvia Donti, Andreas Konrad, Ioli Panidi, Petros C Dinas, Gregory C Bogdanis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olyvia DontiSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-4633
Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5588-1824
Ioli PanidiSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-9339
Petros C DinasFAME Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-9238
Gregory C BogdanisSchool of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. gbogdanis@phed.uoa.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3382-0438

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P 32078-BAustrian Science Fund FWF J 4484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlexibility is an important component of physical fitness for competitive and recreational athletes. It is generally suggested that flexibility training should start from childhood (6-11 years of age) to optimize joint range of motion (ROM) increases; however, evidence is limited and inconsistent.

objectiveTo examine whether there is a difference in the effect of stretching training on flexibility during childhood (6-11 years of age) and adolescence (12-18 years of age).

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched PubMed Central, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and SPORTDiscus, to conduct this systematic review. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials were eligible. No language and date of publication restrictions were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analyses were conducted via an inverse variance random-effects model. GRADE analysis was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.

resultsFrom the 2713 records retrieved 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 1936 participants). Risk of bias was low in 56.9% of all criteria. Confidence in cumulative evidence was moderate. We found that stretching was effective in increasing ROM in both children (SMD = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.77-1.41; Z = 6.65; p < 0.001; I

conclusionsSystematic stretching training increases ROM during both childhood and adolescence. However, larger ROM gains may be induced in childhood than in adolescence when higher stretching volume loads are applied, while adolescents respond equally to high and low stretching volume loads. REGISTRATION: INPLASY, registration number: INPLASY202190032; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-9-0032/.

Indexed as

AdolescentsChildrenStretchingTraining

Identifiers

PMID35792993
PMCPMC9259532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.